chefbenito
New Member
- 2
My fellow forum readers -
I am looking for some serious advice on an insurance situation that has me confused and worried about coverage. Please take the time to review my situation, and help me out, as I am turning to the public before I seek legal advice. Thanks for your time, and advice.
In January 2008 I suffered a serious work related injury. My leg was was crushed in an accident with a machine, and I spent a month in the hospital and the next year recovering. Everything was covered under my workers' compensation insurance (a separate company from my normal health insurance policy with Blue Cross). After a remarkable recovery, and getting back to a very normal life with a few limitations, I decided to settle with the workers' comp agency. Just to make it clear to you all, in December 2010 I signed away my right to "any further medical treatment" and my "right to any additional benefits if my condition worsens as a result of this injury." Workers comp insurance has no more liability, PERIOD.
As luck would have it, 2 weeks after signing those papers I felt a bump in my knee. I thought it was a loose screw from the operations. I went to my orthopedic surgeon, and he confirmed it. The doc said that it was up to me whether or not to have it removed, but the screw wasn't going to get any tighter. The doc's office billed through Blue Cross (my normal health insurance company since 2006) - I paid the copay, and the visit was covered. Bottom line, I want this screw out of my leg, and I don't want to get denied after this minor surgery. I can have this procedure done in the triage unit of my doctor's office building. I have the option of having a local anesthetic instead of being knocked out during the procedure.
I called Blue Cross just making sure that this was now part of their coverage since I no longer had Workers comp. I began to realize that whomever I was talking to was going to be on the defensive for Blue Cross. They referred me to my plan Exclusions; one of which stated - "Services or supplies for any illness or injury arising out of or in the course of employment for which benefits are available under any Workers' Compensation Law or other similar laws whether or not you make a claim for such compensation or receive such benefits." The agent also informed me of possible troubles due to this being a "pre-existing condition."
I called my doctor's staff with the concerns from Blue Cross. They said that if I had to self-pay for the operation that they would cut some costs. It is still estimated around $4,000.00 though .... a far cry from my deductable.
Here are some definitions from my policy that will help with my following questions.
PREEXISTING CONDITION "means any disease, illness, sickness, malady or condition which was diagnosed or treated by a Provider within 12 months prior to your Coverage Date, or which produced symptoms within 12 months prior to your Coverage Date which would have caused an ordinarily prudent person to seek medical diagnosis or treatment"
COVERAGE DATE "means the date on which your coverage under this policy began"
Finally, here are my questions:
1) Do I have a pre-existing condition? I can't tell if "coverage date" means when I was originally given the policy in 2006, or if it means when I renew it every year. If Coverage Date means 2006, then I don't see how it can be "pre-existing" if this accident happened in 2008.
2) Do you think I'm covered by Blue Cross given the information I've provided? I've given up my rights to benefits from Workers' Comp through another insurance company, but how can I go on without ever getting treated for these issues? I'm only 28, but when I am 50 and have another loose screw, are they still going to be saying that Workers Comp is responsible for an accident 25 years ago?
3) Am I setting a precedent if I have to pay out-of-pocket? I am worried that I will jeapordize future appointments or concerns if I pony up the $4,000.00 and pay for it the first time. Again, what if a procedure is $25,000.00 when I'm 50?
4) How should I proceed with my doctor/surgeon? If I file this claim through Blue Cross from the start, the cost will be much more than the deal the doctor gave me if I have to pay out-of-pocket. If I go through with the procedure as a self-pay, then I could still go back to the insurance company and try to file it after-the-fact. I am worried that this will encourage them to deny it more easily though, since it's coming from me, and not the doctor's office.
5) I can always file a claim review if I am denied. Do you see any grounds for this if it should take place?
6) Any other advice?
Thank you for your time, and insight. I never had to think about how much it would cost to take care of myself until now - which is why I am full of details and questions.
I am looking for some serious advice on an insurance situation that has me confused and worried about coverage. Please take the time to review my situation, and help me out, as I am turning to the public before I seek legal advice. Thanks for your time, and advice.
In January 2008 I suffered a serious work related injury. My leg was was crushed in an accident with a machine, and I spent a month in the hospital and the next year recovering. Everything was covered under my workers' compensation insurance (a separate company from my normal health insurance policy with Blue Cross). After a remarkable recovery, and getting back to a very normal life with a few limitations, I decided to settle with the workers' comp agency. Just to make it clear to you all, in December 2010 I signed away my right to "any further medical treatment" and my "right to any additional benefits if my condition worsens as a result of this injury." Workers comp insurance has no more liability, PERIOD.
As luck would have it, 2 weeks after signing those papers I felt a bump in my knee. I thought it was a loose screw from the operations. I went to my orthopedic surgeon, and he confirmed it. The doc said that it was up to me whether or not to have it removed, but the screw wasn't going to get any tighter. The doc's office billed through Blue Cross (my normal health insurance company since 2006) - I paid the copay, and the visit was covered. Bottom line, I want this screw out of my leg, and I don't want to get denied after this minor surgery. I can have this procedure done in the triage unit of my doctor's office building. I have the option of having a local anesthetic instead of being knocked out during the procedure.
I called Blue Cross just making sure that this was now part of their coverage since I no longer had Workers comp. I began to realize that whomever I was talking to was going to be on the defensive for Blue Cross. They referred me to my plan Exclusions; one of which stated - "Services or supplies for any illness or injury arising out of or in the course of employment for which benefits are available under any Workers' Compensation Law or other similar laws whether or not you make a claim for such compensation or receive such benefits." The agent also informed me of possible troubles due to this being a "pre-existing condition."
I called my doctor's staff with the concerns from Blue Cross. They said that if I had to self-pay for the operation that they would cut some costs. It is still estimated around $4,000.00 though .... a far cry from my deductable.
Here are some definitions from my policy that will help with my following questions.
PREEXISTING CONDITION "means any disease, illness, sickness, malady or condition which was diagnosed or treated by a Provider within 12 months prior to your Coverage Date, or which produced symptoms within 12 months prior to your Coverage Date which would have caused an ordinarily prudent person to seek medical diagnosis or treatment"
COVERAGE DATE "means the date on which your coverage under this policy began"
Finally, here are my questions:
1) Do I have a pre-existing condition? I can't tell if "coverage date" means when I was originally given the policy in 2006, or if it means when I renew it every year. If Coverage Date means 2006, then I don't see how it can be "pre-existing" if this accident happened in 2008.
2) Do you think I'm covered by Blue Cross given the information I've provided? I've given up my rights to benefits from Workers' Comp through another insurance company, but how can I go on without ever getting treated for these issues? I'm only 28, but when I am 50 and have another loose screw, are they still going to be saying that Workers Comp is responsible for an accident 25 years ago?
3) Am I setting a precedent if I have to pay out-of-pocket? I am worried that I will jeapordize future appointments or concerns if I pony up the $4,000.00 and pay for it the first time. Again, what if a procedure is $25,000.00 when I'm 50?
4) How should I proceed with my doctor/surgeon? If I file this claim through Blue Cross from the start, the cost will be much more than the deal the doctor gave me if I have to pay out-of-pocket. If I go through with the procedure as a self-pay, then I could still go back to the insurance company and try to file it after-the-fact. I am worried that this will encourage them to deny it more easily though, since it's coming from me, and not the doctor's office.
5) I can always file a claim review if I am denied. Do you see any grounds for this if it should take place?
6) Any other advice?
Thank you for your time, and insight. I never had to think about how much it would cost to take care of myself until now - which is why I am full of details and questions.