Register here to view the forum without ads

Insurance Agent Forum
Join our Facebook Fan Page  Join our LinkedIn Group of Insurance Agents  Follow Insurance Agents Forum on Twitter
Currently Online: 145
Members: 13,183
Discussions: 15,200
Messages: 199,332
Views: 7,986,417

Go Back   Insurance Agent Forum > Insurance Agents and Brokers Forum > General Insurance Agent Discussions

Health Choice One

Scroll down for a discussion on Continuing Education req changed in CA within the General Insurance Agent Discussions.

Okay, here's a poll for y'all. In the State of California, it appears they're trying to find a new way to increase revenues for the ...


Reply to Continuing Education req changed in CA
Old 12-29-2007, 11:30 PM   #1
DHK
Expert
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts:219
Continuing Education req changed in CA             Go to Top


Okay, here's a poll for y'all.

In the State of California, it appears they're trying to find a new way to increase revenues for the state by splitting the L&H insurance license into 2 separate licenses: Life-Only & Accident & Health.

Along with this, is a change in CE requirements.

The old requirements were:
- Licensed from 1-4 years - 50 hours per license term
- Licensed from 5+ years - 30 hours per license term.

The NEW requirements are:
- 24 hours per license term.

This does make it easy to keep your license current with just certification CE courses - such as:
- annuities (8 hour certification then 4 hours ongoing),
- LTC (8 hours per license term),
- CA Partnership LTC (8 hours per license term)
- Ethics (4 hours per license term)

http://www.insurance.ca.gov/0200-ind...quirements.pdf

It is my personal opinion that this requirement is extremely LOW. Much more education should be required by anyone who considers themselves a professional in this industry.

This is one reason that I'm an RFC - the requirement to complete 40 hours of CE every year.

So, do you think states should mandate higher CE, or
Should they just get out of the way and let the "survival of the fittest" rule in our industry?
Choose Insurance Type

Enter Zip Code
DHK is offline   Reply With Quote to Continuing Education req changed in CA

Register Now for FREE!
Are you an Insurance Agent Forum member yet? To sign up for your FREE INSTANT account, fill out the form below!

Username:     Password:   Confirm Password:     E-Mail:   Confirm E-Mail:

    Question of the day:   Time is M*** Agree to forum rules 


Old 12-30-2007, 10:37 AM   #2
Guru
 
GreenSky on Continuing Education req changed in CA - Insurance Agent Forum
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts:4,527
State: GreenSky is an Insurance Agent from California
Re: Continuing Education req changed in CA             Go to Top

Originally Posted by DHK View Post
It is my personal opinion that this requirement is extremely LOW. Much more education should be required by anyone who considers themselves a professional in this industry.

This is one reason that I'm an RFC - the requirement to complete 40 hours of CE every year.

So, do you think states should mandate higher CE, or
Should they just get out of the way and let the "survival of the fittest" rule in our industry?
By using WebCe, 30 hrs. of credit can be had for under $50. And unless you are an idiot, you can finish this stuff in about 2 hours.

If the CE was increased, then it might take 3-4 hours. I see little or no benefit from any CE requirements.

Good agents take the initiative to understand what they are doing. No amount of CE will take a dishonest or stupid person and turn that person into a professional.

Rick
------------------------------------
ILIAA
Training, Community, Support, and Success
Independent Life Insurance Agents Assn
rick@iliaa.org
GreenSky is offline   Reply With Quote to Continuing Education req changed in CA
Old 12-30-2007, 11:56 AM   #3
Guru
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts:4,073
Re: Continuing Education req changed in CA             Go to Top

Gosh, no kidding. And remember, it used to be (back when dinosaurs roamed the earth) that you had to park your butt in a classroom and be forced to sit there for the entire 40 hours. Nowadays, with everything accessible online, the state has simply made it easier for realtors and mortgage brokers to "get into the business" and mess things up!
Mr. Bill is offline   Reply With Quote to Continuing Education req changed in CA
Old 01-02-2008, 11:50 PM   #4
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts:2,097
Re: Continuing Education req changed in CA             Go to Top

By using WebCe, 30 hrs. of credit can be had for under $50. And unless you are an idiot, you can finish this stuff in about 2 hours.

If the CE was increased, then it might take 3-4 hours. I see little or no benefit from any CE requirements.

Good agents take the initiative to understand what they are doing. No amount of CE will take a dishonest or stupid person and turn that person into a professional.
Agreed 100%.

If anything put the barrier to GET INTO THE BUSINESS higher (hey job security...) to keep the slime balls OUT.

The CE is complete junk and a waste of my time and money. I have to take some online classes to learn about Annuities, Medicare, and Universal Life Insurance - when ALL I sell is Health Insurance?

Interestingly enough Health Insurance (individual) is such a small part of CE - yet somehow now that I know about annuities I will be a much better health agent? OK Sure...

Just another way for someone to get my $50 and serve no purpose. Part of the game I suppose... 3 hours of my life every 2 years, it could be worse...
TXINSURANCE is offline   Reply With Quote to Continuing Education req changed in CA
Old 01-03-2008, 02:02 AM   #5
al3
Guru
 
al3 on Continuing Education req changed in CA - Insurance Agent Forum
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts:3,392
Re: Continuing Education req changed in CA             Go to Top

Here is my theory for breaking out the health from the life license.

There is a plan on the drawing boards to be voted on by the CA state Senate (already passed by the Assembly) that will "give" GI health to individuals. One of the wrinkles is that the carriers can only spend 15% on admin cost... 85% must be paid out.

I think a deal was made.

The carriers saw this coming... and realized they will need an army of new agents. But higher-educated agents (able to pass the current exam) would not work for the the low commission that could be paid. The carriers would need low-paid agents to sell their GI products.... since current agents will probably leave the health sector and go into life or something else.

The carriers will need to recruit less-educated agents who won't demand 20% but will be happy at 5%. These less-educated people will be able to "ace" the license exam and get to work ASAP... less time needed to study and the exam will be watered-down.

If you are tossing tortias as Taco Bell, becoming a white-collar "insurance agent" sounds quite good... perhaps a step up the ladder of success?

Yeah, I know it sounds like a conspiracy theory... but I spent a few years with Blue Shield of CA in 1975 (I met my wife there... she was an admin to one of the VPs) and I learned a lot (at a young age) about how closely the large carriers work with legislative and regulatory staff.

No crime committed here and nothing unethical either but I think there was a deal. YMMV.

Al
al3 is offline   Reply With Quote to Continuing Education req changed in CA
Old 01-03-2008, 02:35 AM   #6
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts:2,097
Re: Continuing Education req changed in CA             Go to Top

One of the wrinkles is that the carriers can only spend 15% on admin cost... 85% must be paid out.
I see CA commissions going to 0% real soon.

This could spread like wildfire also.
TXINSURANCE is offline   Reply With Quote to Continuing Education req changed in CA
Old 01-03-2008, 04:16 AM   #7
Guru
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts:4,073
Re: Continuing Education req changed in CA             Go to Top

Let's face it, the exam is pretty much a joke as it is, otherwise you wouldn't have every washed up realtor and mortgage broker getting their insurance license and joining World Financial Group.

The "barriers to entry" should INCREASE, not decrease!
Mr. Bill is offline   Reply With Quote to Continuing Education req changed in CA
Old 01-03-2008, 04:18 AM   #8
Guru
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts:4,073
Re: Continuing Education req changed in CA             Go to Top

Oh, and one way to make it really tough would be for the state to charge about $2,499 for the initial license and $800 per year for annual licensing (just like a corporation). What d'ya think about that? Think of all those "parked" licenseees that would go away...
Mr. Bill is offline   Reply With Quote to Continuing Education req changed in CA
Old 01-03-2008, 09:36 AM   #9
Guru
 
salpro22 on Continuing Education req changed in CA - Insurance Agent Forum
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts:2,217
Re: Continuing Education req changed in CA             Go to Top

Originally Posted by al3 View Post
Here is my theory for breaking out the health from the life license.

There is a plan on the drawing boards to be voted on by the CA state Senate (already passed by the Assembly) that will "give" GI health to individuals. One of the wrinkles is that the carriers can only spend 15% on admin cost... 85% must be paid out.

I think a deal was made.

The carriers saw this coming... and realized they will need an army of new agents. But higher-educated agents (able to pass the current exam) would not work for the the low commission that could be paid. The carriers would need low-paid agents to sell their GI products.... since current agents will probably leave the health sector and go into life or something else.

The carriers will need to recruit less-educated agents who won't demand 20% but will be happy at 5%. These less-educated people will be able to "ace" the license exam and get to work ASAP... less time needed to study and the exam will be watered-down.

If you are tossing tortias as Taco Bell, becoming a white-collar "insurance agent" sounds quite good... perhaps a step up the ladder of success?

Yeah, I know it sounds like a conspiracy theory... but I spent a few years with Blue Shield of CA in 1975 (I met my wife there... she was an admin to one of the VPs) and I learned a lot (at a young age) about how closely the large carriers work with legislative and regulatory staff.

No crime committed here and nothing unethical either but I think there was a deal. YMMV.

Al
GI plans at 5%. Sign me up. That is like shooting fish in a barrel. I receive $100 for every MHIP application I sell, so anything above $167 a month is worthless from a financial perspective. I'd focus on that if I were you by finding people who have been declined by insurance carriers and don't know what do. Cross sell them a quality accident plan and CI if available and the numbers get better.
------------------------------------
[COLOR=#000066]"Tell me and I will forget. Show me and I will remember. Involve me and I will understand." Confucius

[/COLOR]
http://insurancesaleslibrary.blogspot.com/
salpro22 is offline   Reply With Quote to Continuing Education req changed in CA
Old 01-03-2008, 09:44 AM   #10
Guru
 
BKrocko on Continuing Education req changed in CA - Insurance Agent Forum
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts:432
Re: Continuing Education req changed in CA             Go to Top

Originally Posted by DHK View Post
- Ethics (4 hours per license term)

http://www.insurance.ca.gov/0200-ind...quirements.pdf

It is my personal opinion that this requirement is extremely LOW. Much more education should be required by anyone who considers themselves a professional in this industry.



So, do you think states should mandate higher CE, or
Should they just get out of the way and let the "survival of the fittest" rule in our industry?
I have to laugh - seems like every state requires a CE course in Ethics.

I was finishing up Grad School back in the mid 80's - about the time "Wall Street" and "Greed is Good" became fashionable. There was a huge scramble to require all students (Undergrad and Grad) to complete a semester in an Ethics course.

I never really understood that - either you have 'em or you don't. If you have not learned and practiced ethical behavior by the time you are a young adult, it's a lost cause. Taking a course in them is not going to change which course of action you choose to pursue.

Tongue 'n' cheek - I think that NAA was behind the push to require only a Life License and Mega was behind the Health/Accident portion. I'm sure they both fought very hard to get rid of the Ethics requirement.

Last edited by BKrocko : 01-03-2008 at 09:51 AM.
BKrocko is offline   Reply With Quote to Continuing Education req changed in CA
Old 01-03-2008, 09:47 AM   #11
Guru
 
STIBROKER@AUSTIN.RR.COM on Continuing Education req changed in CA - Insurance Agent Forum
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts:3,761
State: STIBROKER@AUSTIN.RR.COM is an Insurance Agent from Texas
Re: Continuing Education req changed in CA             Go to Top

Man I will be glad when I do not have to do this anymore...
------------------------------------


Texas Life Insurance
Houston Life Insurance
STIBROKER@AUSTIN.RR.COM is offline   Reply With Quote to Continuing Education req changed in CA
Old 01-03-2008, 10:10 AM   #12
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts:2,097
Re: Continuing Education req changed in CA             Go to Top

man I will be glad when I do not have to do this anymore...
What is it 20 years in Texas?
TXINSURANCE is offline   Reply With Quote to Continuing Education req changed in CA
Old 01-03-2008, 10:21 AM   #13
Guru
 
salpro22 on Continuing Education req changed in CA - Insurance Agent Forum
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts:2,217
Re: Continuing Education req changed in CA             Go to Top

Originally Posted by BKrocko View Post
I have to laugh - seems like every state requires a CE course in Ethics.

I was finishing up Grad School back in the mid 80's - about the time "Wall Street" and "Greed is Good" became fashionable. There was a huge scramble to require all students (Undergrad and Grad) to complete a semester in an Ethics course.

I never really understood that - either you have 'em or you don't. If you have not learned and practiced ethical behavior by the time you are a young adult, it's a lost cause. Taking a course in them is not going to change which course of action you choose to pursue.

Tongue 'n' cheek - I think that NAA was behind the push to require only a Life License and Mega was behind the Health/Accident portion. I'm sure they both fought very hard to get rid of the Ethics requirement.
Quite true, but it makes some people feel all warm and fuzzy when we have to refresh our ethics foundation. The license regulations for agents are a joke.
salpro22 is offline   Reply With Quote to Continuing Education req changed in CA
Old 01-03-2008, 10:27 AM   #14
Guru
 
STIBROKER@AUSTIN.RR.COM on Continuing Education req changed in CA - Insurance Agent Forum
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts:3,761
State: STIBROKER@AUSTIN.RR.COM is an Insurance Agent from Texas
Re: Continuing Education req changed in CA             Go to Top

In your 21 first year you apply with tdi to get your grandfather cert. then no more of this BS....only 8 more years for me.....

Originally Posted by TXINSURANCE View Post
What is it 20 years in Texas?

------------------------------------


Texas Life Insurance
Houston Life Insurance
STIBROKER@AUSTIN.RR.COM is offline   Reply With Quote to Continuing Education req changed in CA
Old 01-04-2008, 02:39 PM   #15
Super Genius
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts:29
Re: Continuing Education req changed in CA             Go to Top

Well every state has their different requirements. Nevada, where i'm in, is a great example. Due to the high "transience" in Las Vegas and other major cities in Nevada, the department of insurance requires an 80% to pass all examinations. Only those with determination & willingness pass and let me tell you, it wasn't easy for me.
Bhains Insurance Broker is offline   Reply With Quote to Continuing Education req changed in CA
Old 01-04-2008, 05:08 PM   #16
Guru
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts:4,073
Re: Continuing Education req changed in CA             Go to Top

Not sure what you mean. All it took was some $$$ for me to get a non-resident NV license.

Choose Insurance Type Enter Zip Code


Mr. Bill is offline   Reply With Quote to Continuing Education req changed in CA
Reply to Continuing Education req changed in CA

  Insurance Forum > Insurance Agent Forum > Insurance Agents and Brokers Forum > General Insurance Agent Discussions



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads with Continuing Education req changed in CA
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to fund a college education Alsky General Insurance Agent Discussions 41 05-22-2009 07:11 PM
Secure Horizons/ Pacificare Commissions and Changed Benefits honestagent Senior Insurance Forum 15 12-18-2007 01:59 AM
HSAInsider has changed-Did you know? wilkin Individual Health Insurance Forum 35 07-07-2007 10:02 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12 Secure
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0