3. What are the primary reasons for the difference in cost?
Choice. In a
ppo the insured makes a choice of who to see from primary care to specialist w/o prior approval.
HMO the primary doctor makes the choice, you must seek his/her premission to see specialist.
4. Besides having the network and referal thing, what are the disadvantages that you see if this person joins an
HMO?
Freedom of choice. Asking permission for treatment. The possibility they could say no.
5. Who makes the overall decisions on an
HMO plan for treatment; is it the PCP or the Specialist - if applicable here? Or somebody else?
PCP is the gate keeper. He makes the decision simply by allowing or not allowing the specialist to look at you.
6. If this person doesn't mind having to stay in network and would help keep more money in his or her pocket, do you suggest an
HMO plan then?
IT's going to depend on the
HMO, some are excellent, some are in the business of saying NO. I don't know CIGNA's track record. Where I live the
HMO developed such a bad reputation three DECADES ago, they haven't been able to shake it, even though they've changed. People remember.
7. Besides a deductible and copays if applicable, what else should I advise this person to look at and ask HR if she selects the
HMO program in terms of out of pocket costs and how the
HMO operates?
Be aware of annual deductibles vs. copays per visit. Compare summaries side by side. Wording is a factor. Copays don't count towards deducts or co insurance in most cases.
?Basically, her overall concern is money. She's healthy. She doesn't go to the doctor too often and is open to changing doctors. She just wants to be certain she'll have adequate coverage and no surprise out of pocket costs and she wasn't sure if she'll have that if she joins an
HMO. In the past, she has always opted for
PPO."
Time to break out the pencil and pad and play what if? That's about all you can do. Also she has to look at how much she uses health care. Once a year or less, it doesn't matter. Once a quarter or more, it might because the PCP has to be seen BEFORE any specialist to gain covered access. So sometimes it is really making two appointments to really have one.
"Will treatments be different in terms of adequacy and what's best for the patient be different (in a bad way) if she joins an
HMO?"
No way of telling except history of complaints.
"I've just heard things from other people like: 'hmos suck. stay away. avoid hmos at all costs.' and I am wondering why now, especially because now I have been approached by someobody I know for answers that I'd like to provide."
For some, it's a matter of being told or asking permission to use healthcare that sucks. If I know I need a certain treatment by a certain specialist, it makes me angry to have to work into my primaryPCP schedule first, before I can see who can really help me.
When the price goes down, you are usually giving up choice and in some cases quality. Whether that's OK or not, is an individual thing. There isn't a right answer.