CMS Proposes New Standards for 2018

Yagents

Guru
5000 Post Club
12,134
Arizona
Note to self: Don't wait for the implosion to occur before acting on it.
Too little too late.

--------------------------
Yesterday, CMS/CCIIO released the proposed 2018 HHS Notice of Benefit and Payment Parameters (CMS-9934-P) and Draft 2018 Actuarial Value Calculator. The publication date is 9/6/2016. The comment period will close on 10/6/2016. CMS is issuing this rule earlier in the calendar year in order to provide more certainty to the Marketplace as it continues to mature.

"Right now, we are preparing to serve millions of consumers with a new set of innovations during the upcoming Marketplace Open Enrollment. As we do this, we are proposing today a set of critical actions based upon our first 3 years' experience that, if finalized, would improve how consumers and health plans interact with the Marketplace," said Acting Administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Andy Slavitt. "These proposals help fulfill the promise that affordable, quality health coverage can be provided to everyone who needs it."



Beginning in 2017, the proposed policies will take important steps to strengthen one of the Marketplace’s key tools for protecting consumers’ access to high-quality, affordable coverage options: the risk adjustment program. The rule introduces changes that will make risk adjustment even more effective at pooling risk, allowing issuers to focus on meeting the needs of consumers. First, the rule proposes updates beginning in 2017 to better reflect the risk associated with enrollees who are not enrolled for a full 12 months. Second, beginning in 2018, the rule proposes to use prescription drug utilization data to improve the predictive ability of our risk adjustment models. Third, also beginning in 2018, the rule proposes to establish transfers that will help to better spread the risk of high-cost enrollees, a change that would improve the risk-sharing benefits of the program.



In addition to these improvements to risk adjustment, this proposed rule contains other provisions to improve the Marketplace consumer experience and strengthen the individual and small group markets as a whole. The proposed rule would give consumers additional tools for assessing the networks of competing plans; broaden availability of this year’s new standardized plan options by accommodating state cost-sharing rules; and create consumer protections for consumers enrolling through the direct enrollment channel. The proposed rule would also create multiple child age bands that address instances in which consumers could face large premium changes after turning age 21; amend the guaranteed renewability regulations to provide additional flexibility for issuers to remain in an insurance market in certain situations; and codify several special enrollment periods that are already available to consumers in order to ensure the rules are clear and to limit abuse. It also seeks information on a number of suggestions offered by issuers, consumers, providers, and others on further improving the risk pool, such as additional changes to special enrollment period policies or outreach; clarifying coordination of benefit rules between Medicare, Medicaid, and the Marketplace; and providing greater certainty on the amount of user fee revenue spent on education and outreach.



The proposed rule builds on other recent actions to strengthen the Marketplace, including a recent request for information seeking public comment on concerns that some health care providers and provider-affiliated organizations may be steering Medicare or Medicaid enrolled or eligible people into a Marketplace qualified health plan to obtain higher reimbursement rates; the announcement of a new outreach strategy targeting young adults; and the introduction of a pilot project in certain states to display information regarding QHP provider networks to promote greater transparency on HealthCare.gov.



The proposed rule can be found at: https://s3.amazonaws.com/public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2016-20896.pdf and on 09/06/2016 available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2016-20896

CMS Press Release, click here: https://www.cms.gov/Newsroom/MediaR...ses/2016-Press-releases-items/2016-08-29.html

CMS Fact Sheet, click here: https://www.cms.gov/Newsroom/MediaReleaseDatabase/Fact-sheets/2016-Fact-sheets-items/2016-08-29.html
 
This is going to be AWESOME....

since there will only 1 carrier left in most areas by 2018.......
 
This is going to be AWESOME....

since there will only 1 carrier left in most areas by 2018.......

There may be none here - won't know till the end of September. . . .they should lift the tax penalty since some citizens just will not be able to comply if all carriers leave their area . . . .
 
No carrier = No Penalty

1 carrier = no penalty if cheapest bronze would cost more than 8.1600001% of your income.
 
No carrier = No Penalty

1 carrier = no penalty if cheapest bronze would cost more than 8.1600001% of your income.

Hmmm...that's not I am reading it.

There could 2, 5, or 20 carriers in your county, but if the lowest cost bronze is less than the 8.3% (8.16?) threshold, then you are exempt from the penalty.
 
Hmmm...that's not I am reading it.

There could 2, 5, or 20 carriers in your county, but if the lowest cost bronze is less than the 8.3% (8.16?) threshold, then you are exempt from the penalty.

The "unaffordable exemption" to the individual mandate is allowed if the premium for the lowest cost Bronze plan in your rating area costs more than 8.16% of your household MAGI income (8% in 2014, 8.05% in 2015 and 8.13% in 2016). MAGI for this exemption is AGI plus foreign income and tax exempt interest, for your whole household (the people on your tax return). This MAGI differs from the MAGI for the APTC subsidy in that this MAGI does not include the non-taxed portion of social security benefits. This affordability calculation is based on the full premium for all applicable members of the family, unlike the affordability calculation for employer-sponsored coverage that is based on self-only premium.

It has never been 8.3%. Well, not yet, anyway.

If your county has 0 carriers, then no penalty.

Like Yagents said, if your county has 1 carrier, it will likely have a high cost bronze plan.

And, like KGMom said, if you have 2+ carriers, you just pick the lowest cost bronze plan.
 
KG, where were you reading?

Ann gave a much better explanation.

I was trying my new cryptic texan talk.

I'll add that if there is only 1 carrier, the rate increase can be substantial, boosting more into this exemption category.

----------

Much more detail here in english:

They might outsource SHOP.
Requirement for carriers to sell all year, not just OEP.
HSA option required in all areas


The Proposed 2018 Notice Of Benefit And Payment Parameters: Part 2

Haven't read part 1 yet:

The Proposed 2018 Notice Of Benefit And Payment Parameters: Part 1
 
KG, where were you reading?

Ann gave a much better explanation.

I was trying my new cryptic texan talk.

I'll add that if there is only 1 carrier, the rate increase can be substantial, boosting more into this exemption category.

I apologize. I had 8.3 in my head, but its 8.13.

My one carrier comment was meant for people who come back here later and see it and I wanted to make it clear. ;)
 
Back
Top