Obamacare: Is the Repeal for Real?

Brokers Alliance

Guru
Sponsor
958
Arizona
Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney said, “If elected as president, I will repeal Obamacare on my first day in office.” Tea Party favorite Senator Michelle Bachman has been repeating the same mantra as Mitt and her Republican colleagues. But is that just party line bravado? In there any real chance Obamacare can be repealed?

Speaking of bravado, California Congresswomen and former Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi said Obamacare was “ironclad.” Her statement was meant to suck the air out the room because iron rusts when it’s exposed to oxygen. The most common anti-rust treatment to protect iron is to galvanize it in a tank of molten hot zinc. With more than half of all Americans still opposed to Obamacare, galvanizing independents to coalesce around the Supreme Court victory isn’t going to happen. And that reality may extend to the president himself. No one’s buying the “ironclad” kool-aid being sold in front of Nancy’s house. Well, it isn’t her house anymore. They’re buying tea by the gallons, galvanized around the economic platforms of the tea (taxed enough already) party.

The independent voters will control the 2012 election. The majority of independent voters are middle class, federal tax payers. If the DNC can’t re-characterize the tax as a simple penalty for non-participants in Obamacare, they stand to lose the entire election across the board.

If the tea leaves are correct, then independents voters are fed up with stimulus spending and high unemployment, which could spell real trouble for the Democrats in November. But are independents fed up enough to send 60 Republicans to the Senate? That’s unlikely.

What might happen is a narrow Republican victory that could hit the political trifecta: the presidency, the House and the Senate. Winning the Triple Crown would put the GOP in a position to neutralize Obamacare with a one page reconciliation bill that only needs 50 Senate votes. Here’s how it could happen.

The presidential race was already tight before the SCOTUS ruling. Just 24 hours later, the Romney campaign received $4 million, a significant indication of windfall donations yet to come. This may be the biggest campaign spending spree in U.S. election history, enough perhaps to fund the first year of Obamacare.

But money aside, Mitt needs to stay on message. And that message is, “It’s the economy stupid.”

He must insert the financial impact of Obamacare on federal taxes, Medicare benefits and the nation’s $16 trillion debt. The swing states that are in play are in play because of independents, libertarians and fiscally conservative Democrats. Staying on message, staying on the economy is what they want to hear. If Romney can remain above the current political fray, do reasonably well in the debates and stay away from the albatross of Romneycare, he could win a narrow Electoral College victory. Current polling suggests that the House of Representatives will remain in Republican hands, so the real battle ground is in the Senate. Here’s the preview:

Republicans hold 47 seats with 10 seats up for reelection, and 4 of those seats could go either way. The Democrats hold 53 seats with 23 seats up for reelection, and 10 of those seats are toss-ups. It’s still too early for scientific polling, but the Republicans could legitimately lose two of the four vulnerable seats. The real game is in the Democratic races, where the DNC could very well lose five of 10 seats currently up for grabs. Under this scenario, the Republicans win 50 seats, with Mitt Romney’s vice president casting the tie-breaking vote. That’s not repeal, but for all practical purposes, it would gut the spending provisions of Obamacare and make it worthless to implement.

For those opposed to Obamacare, the November 6th election is the last real opportunity to stop what the Supreme Court affirmed. After that, the Republicans can only hope that the apocalyptic predictions of the end of the world predicted by the Mayan calendar actually occur.
 
But are independents fed up enough to send 60 Republicans to the Senate? That’s unlikely.

You are probably right, but it only took 51 to pass Obamacare, you can gut it with the same number.
 
You can gut it with 51 votes because it was ruled a tax.
Funny, what saved it may be what does it in.
 
The problem is Mitt has to come up with an alterative. It isn't enough to be negitive. What is his plan for pre-x. How is he going to get it affordable.
 
b61mack said:
The problem is Mitt has to come up with an alterative. It isn't enough to be negitive. What is his plan for pre-x. How is he going to get it affordable.

My only question is why 1 convoluted bill to totally remake our "healthcare" sector. Why not make smaller changes. PCIP I think is a good idea, Republicans have advocated risk pools for a while and solves the problem of people being uninsurable, what's funny about PCIP is it penalized those who have carried coverage over those that have gone without regardless of if going without was due to always being uninsurable or just lack of interest in purchasing coverage.
 
The problem is Mitt has to come up with an alterative. It isn't enough to be negitive. What is his plan for pre-x. How is he going to get it affordable.

I disagree. The general public is pretty ignorant and know little about the bill. They either like it or they don't, mainly for political party affiliations/reasons. The general public doesn't have the health insurance knowledge we do, nor the budgetary knowledge that a business person would; most can't balance their own checkbook.

Until the law is fully implemented, it can be repealed with no alternative solution. Once the law is fully implemented, however, we're stuck with it and it will NEVER come off the books. The only shot for this to happen is 50 or 51 Rep. Senators, keep the House, and get Mitt in the WH.

Otherwise, it's there forever, along with all of the consequences.
 
The only shot for this to happen is 50 or 51 Rep. Senators, keep the House, and get Mitt in the WH.


Possibly.

Mitch McConnell is not a sure vote to repeal. That guy (and a bunch others) need to be replaced.

I agree with Peter. I like PCIP. Always have. Would be better if agents really were paid, but they ran out of money to run PCIP so they had to find a way to write less of it.

Answer was . . . stop paying agents.

Makes you wonder how they will run the rest of the program if they can't fund PCIP.

But several small laws would have been better. Even Bill Clinton told them that.
 
So your answer is do nothing about pre-x. Woman with a pre-x condition, will have to lose everything she owns and go on welfare, to get coverage. That is what the press will report. Correct me if i am wrong.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top