Premiums For Many In The Individual Market May Change Next Year

Duaine

Guru
100+ Post Club
Health insurance premiums for people with subsidies could increase substantially in some markets – but consumers who shop around may not end up paying more, a new report out Thursday says.

Shopping around may not be as likely, however, under proposed rules also released Thursday by the Obama administration which will automatically re-enroll the vast majority of those who are signed up for plans through the online marketplaces. Automatic re-enrollments might ease the experience, but will also make it less likely consumers will check out other options.

Consumers who choose to would still be able to shop around, the administration said. And the Avalere study shows they should.

The analysis of rates filed in nine states found that as insurers battle for a share of the individual market, some plans that were the low-priced leaders this year are not the least expensive options next year.

Because subsidies through the Affordable Care Act are tied to “benchmark” plans, which are the second lowest-cost silver-tier plans in each market, even those with subsidies could see the monthly amounts they pay change. In most of the states studied, the second lowest-cost plan is changing.

“If you are a savvy buyer, you could pick a low-cost plan and probably avoid a significant rate increase,” said Caroline Pearson, vice president at Avalere. But those who do nothing may end up paying more.

Here’s how it works: Subsidy-eligible individuals – those who earn between about $11,480 and $45,960 – can enroll in any plan they like. But those who choose plans other than the benchmark silver plans would pay the difference in monthly premium cost, dollar for dollar.

In a hypothetical example cited by Avalere, a 40-year-old consumer who enrolled this year in a $214-a-month benchmark plan paid $58 of her own money toward the premium after the subsidy. But now her insurer plans to raise rates next year to $267 a month. Because other plans have come in lower, her plan is no longer the benchmark. That benchmark plan is now a different one, whose price is $231 a month.

Unless she switches plans, the consumer must now pay the difference. Her income has stayed the same, so her subsidy of $173 a month remains unchanged. But, because her plan is now $36 more than the benchmark plan, her monthly payment rises to $94 for the premium – unless she switches to the lower-cost plan.

Instead of narrowing, as might be expected, the range in premium prices widened from 2014 to 2015, Pearson said.

Reasons varied. In some markets, new insurers are entering with low rates, possibly to try to wrest market share. At the same time, the low-priced plans in some markets are raising rates because they won significant market share the first year – and are hoping to keep their new customers even with a price increase.

The Avalere study looked at rate filings in Connecticut, Indiana, Maine, Maryland, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia and Washington. The filings have not yet been approved by regulators, so the rates might change before the fall open enrollment season begins.

Premiums For Many In The Individual Market May Change Next Year – Capsules - The KHN Blog
 
Because subsidies are based on the second lowest cost silver plan in each state, the trick is to have 2 insurers with plans whose premiums reduce over time, and still qualify for ACA benefits.

If 2 companies are able to do this, they will capture much of the market, for who wants to pay larger premiums for the same subsidies for similar coverage?
National Prosperity Life and Health should receive its Texas license as a life and health insurer next month.
While initially we are providing Health Matching Insurance for self funded employers of 200 or more employees, eventually we will go on a state exchange and provide the license for another insurer to use our patented product.
Over time, through our unique HMI benefits, we can provide significantly lower premiums for similar coverage.
We will save the government subsidy taxes, and save the policyholders premiums.
It took 3 years of working with Milliman to craft this product.
Look for it being available in a state near you in 2015.
Don Levit,CLU,ChFC
Treasurer
National Prosperity Life and Health
 
who wants to pay larger premiums for the same subsidies for similar coverage?

If your target is the cheap seats, you are probably right.

Educated consumers are often willing to pay a little more for a better plan, broader network, and expanded Rx formulary.
 
If your target is the cheap seats, you are probably right.

Educated consumers are often willing to pay a little more for a better plan, broader network, and expanded Rx formulary.

I agree with you
In addition to analyzing these features on a yearly basis the educated consumer is able to visualize where his plan may take him in the next five to ten years based on past experience
Doing so will find him projecting premiums to double in ten years with plan X
With HMI through National Prosperity Life and Health our quoting engine developed by Milliman will show the typical client even with claims ten to twenty percentage over the average will save sixty to eighty percent including medical inflation in cheap seats or expensive seats using an apples to apples comparison
Don Levit
 
If your target is the cheap seats, you are probably right.

Educated consumers are often willing to pay a little more for a better plan, broader network, and expanded Rx formulary.

Cheap seats are 87% of the market (according to HHS's April report, only 13% ended up in gold/platinum), and the cheap players in bronze/silver got the lions share of consumers-it's no secret.

Of course, there are some educated consumers, and some consumers we educate. There are myriad scenarios where buying up actually saves money. The vast majority just look for the cheapest one that works, and that's the truth.
 
Back
Top