Over 150.000 insurance professionals and consumers come to the Insurance Forum every month. Click here to register for FREE


Go Back   Insurance Forums > Insurance Agents and Brokers Forum > Health Care Reform Forum

Reply to STM and Proposed Changes     
Old 03-26-2017, 05:03 AM   #11
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts:555
State: junkman is an Insurance Agent from Tennessee
STM and Proposed Changes Re: STM and Proposed Changes
Underwritten Farm Bureau HDHP for those that can pass underwriting but pays no one commissions. ACA doesn't pay either so nothing lost.

Some small groups will be forced if possible.

STM has too many uncomfortable coverage holes for me to like it.
------------------------------------
  Reply With Quote to STM and Proposed Changes
Old 03-28-2017, 11:23 AM   #12
Super Genius
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts:201
State: Evan is an Insurance Agent from Alabama
STM and Proposed Changes Re: STM and Proposed Changes
I mean you eliminate STM the next option is Fixed Indemnity Plans. Good job CMS.
------------------------------------
  Reply With Quote to STM and Proposed Changes
Old 03-29-2017, 12:09 AM   #13
Guru
AllenChicago on STM and Proposed Changes
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts:8,239
State: AllenChicago is an Insurance Agent from Illinois
AllenChicago is a member of 5000 posts Super VIP club
STM and Proposed Changes Re: STM and Proposed Changes
Originally Posted by Evan View Post
I mean you eliminate STM the next option is Fixed Indemnity Plans. Good job CMS.
One company has put out a very biased matrix comparing STM to Fixed Indemnity. Fixed Indemnity wins by a long-shot. (Continuation of Coverage, No Deductible, No limit on duration..) Of course, none of the benefits of STM were illustrated.
------------------------------------
  Reply With Quote to STM and Proposed Changes
Old 04-04-2017, 06:03 PM   #14
Guru
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts:1,099
State: yorkriver1 is an Insurance Agent from Undisclosed Location
yorkriver1 is a member of 1000 posts VIP club
STM and Proposed Changes Re: STM and Proposed Changes
Originally Posted by AllenChicago View Post
One company has put out a very biased matrix comparing STM to Fixed Indemnity. Fixed Indemnity wins by a long-shot. (Continuation of Coverage, No Deductible, No limit on duration..) Of course, none of the benefits of STM were illustrated.
Do they list the individual coverage limits on their no deductible reimbursement plans? There is no comparison with plans that have a deductible, coinsurance and maximum annual out of pocket (up to policy max, often $1mil.) I can't imagine a fixed indemnity that has anything close to a potential $1 mil. payout.

No limit on duration and continuation are good features, and either way the purchaser will have some heavy out of pocket in a catastrophic illness or accident. Still better than no coverage.
------------------------------------
  Reply With Quote to STM and Proposed Changes
Old 04-05-2017, 12:03 AM   #15
Guru
AllenChicago on STM and Proposed Changes
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts:8,239
State: AllenChicago is an Insurance Agent from Illinois
AllenChicago is a member of 5000 posts Super VIP club
STM and Proposed Changes Re: STM and Proposed Changes
Originally Posted by yorkriver1 View Post
Do they list the individual coverage limits on their no deductible reimbursement plans? There is no comparison with plans that have a deductible, coinsurance and maximum annual out of pocket (up to policy max, often $1mil.) I can't imagine a fixed indemnity that has anything close to a potential $1 mil. payout.

No limit on duration and continuation are good features, and either way the purchaser will have some heavy out of pocket in a catastrophic illness or accident. Still better than no coverage.
The last one I sold was in 2011 from Philadelphia American. It had a $1 million coverage limit and zero deductible. To get to $1 million though, you had to spend weeks in the hospital.

But that was my last Fixed Indemnity for a reason. The company refused to pay $22,000 of hospital/medical expenses, claiming that they were related to a liver disorder the client had 8 years earlier. You can imagine how angry he and his wife were at ME for selling him this "garbage".

To help soothe things over, I met with the client/spouse and helped submit letters requesting re-consideration to Phil Am, and filing complaints to the Dept of Insurance. In response, the company sent me an agent questionnaire to fill out, and so did the Illinois Dept of Insurance. After weeks of this, the end result was a reduction of his outstanding bill from $22,000 to just over $18,000. For a Husband/Wife/Child on a $35,000 salary, this was still a huge amount of $$$.

They set up a payment plan, and forgave me enough to allow me to help them get on a subsidized ObamaCare plan in 2013. But who knows.. it could have just been a Philadelphia American issue with how they operate. Needless to say, I didn't want to have anything to do with them from that point forward.

I suppose each of us have our likes and dislikes, based on personal experiences with specific companies and plans. For many agents and consumers, Fixed Indemnity is probably a good fit. Depending on what does or does not come from our new HHS Secretary this year, I may seriously re-visit the fixed-indemnity option again. It just won't be with Phil Am.
------------------------------------
  Reply With Quote to STM and Proposed Changes
Old 04-05-2017, 12:58 AM   #16
Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts:1,009
State: SamIam is an Insurance Agent from Undisclosed Location
STM and Proposed Changes Re: STM and Proposed Changes
From what I've seen Philadelphia American might be the best when it comes to indemnity plans.
------------------------------------
  Reply With Quote to STM and Proposed Changes
Old 04-05-2017, 10:08 AM   #17
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts:555
State: junkman is an Insurance Agent from Tennessee
STM and Proposed Changes Re: STM and Proposed Changes
Now health insurance is coming to indemnity plans for those without access to group? Bend over and kiss your ass good bye.
------------------------------------
  Reply With Quote to STM and Proposed Changes
Old 04-05-2017, 03:34 PM   #18
Guru
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts:6,395
State: scagnt83 is an Insurance Agent from South Carolina
scagnt83 is a member of 5000 posts Super VIP club
STM and Proposed Changes
Originally Posted by junkman View Post
Now health insurance is coming to indemnity plans for those without access to group? Bend over and kiss your ass good bye.
One of my annuity client just lost his job, 2 years before being Medicare eligible. Cobra is cheaper than individual premiums at his age. He would go ahead and retire now, but can't afford $1,500 per month for insurance. STM is not an option because of preexisting condition.
So he hopes to find a part time gig with benefits. Sad. And terrible economically for this country in many ways.
------------------------------------
  Reply With Quote to STM and Proposed Changes
Old 04-05-2017, 03:50 PM   #19
Guru
kgmom219 on STM and Proposed Changes
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts:4,832
State: kgmom219 is an Insurance Agent from Texas
kgmom219 is a member of 1000 posts VIP club
STM and Proposed Changes Re: STM and Proposed Changes
Originally Posted by scagnt83 View Post
One of my annuity client just lost his job, 2 years before being Medicare eligible. Cobra is cheaper than individual premiums at his age. He would go ahead and retire now, but can't afford $1,500 per month for insurance. STM is not an option because of preexisting condition.
So he hopes to find a part time gig with benefits. Sad. And terrible economically for this country in many ways.
This is absolutely the segment (55-64) that is in trouble. Indy is more than COBRA. And if they aren't working, their income is greater than 300% FPL (300-400 gives basically no help)

Is 2 person group an option?

------------------------------------
Good things don't come to those who wait. They come to those who work their butts off and never give up.
  Reply With Quote to STM and Proposed Changes
Old 04-05-2017, 03:59 PM   #20
Guru
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts:6,395
State: scagnt83 is an Insurance Agent from South Carolina
scagnt83 is a member of 5000 posts Super VIP club
STM and Proposed Changes
Originally Posted by kgmom219 View Post

This is absolutely the segment (55-64) that is in trouble. Indy is more than COBRA. And if they aren't working, their income is greater than 300% FPL (300-400 gives basically no help)

Is 2 person group an option?
Unfortunately not really in this situation. Long story short, he has a few possible options and I think he will be fine. Worst case he will pay a few months of COBRA premiums. But many are not that fortunate.

If I'm not mistaken, he is in a catch-22 because subsidies are based on prior years income... which was $80k. But now that he has zero income he gets nothing. But next year, he could technically qualify for subsidies if his income this year was low enough... but then the IRS would take those subsidies back after he reports income over 400%FPL for that year. Did I get that straight? Is there some kind of subsidy exemption I don't know of if you just lost your job?
------------------------------------
  Reply With Quote to STM and Proposed Changes
Reply to STM and Proposed Changes 

  Insurance Agent Forum > Insurance Forums > Insurance Agents and Brokers Forum > Health Care Reform Forum




Similar Threads with STM and Proposed Changes
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CMS: STM Limited to 3 Months - No Renewal Allowed Yagents Health Care Reform Forum 101 09-25-2016 07:37 AM
Upcoming HHS Ruling on STM and USHealth Advisors Kelly Carolan Health Insurance and Ancillary Benefits 1 07-01-2016 09:42 AM
STM As a Viable Alternative for Obamacare Paradigm Health Insurance and Ancillary Benefits 29 06-21-2016 09:02 AM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:52 AM.

Forum enabled with vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.


Join the Forum - It's FREE

Share This Page



Weekly Poll

Where do we go from here? POLL
Nothing - No ACA fixes - status quo
29.82 %
HHS Rulings and band aid bills
17.54 %
Hail Mary repeal and/or replace bill
17.54 %
A bipartisan bill to fix ACA
35.09 %

Voters: 57. This poll is closed