Over 85.000 insurance professionals and consumers come to the Insurance Forum every month. Click here to register for FREE and find out why.

Insurance Agent Forum
Join our Facebook Fan Page  Join our LinkedIn Group of Insurance Agents  Follow Insurance Agents Forum on Twitter
Currently Online: 113
Members: 19,347
Discussions: 22,264
Messages: 285,861

Go Back   Insurance Agent Forum > Insurance Agents and Brokers Forum > Life Insurance Forum


Reply to Horrible Underwriting Carriers
Old 07-31-2010, 10:31 AM   #1
Super Genius
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts:21
State: BatonRougeChicken is an Insurance Agent from Alabama
Horrible Underwriting Carriers             Go to Top


I am a captive NYL agent and also use a lot of Ohio National policies as well. These carriers are HARD to get good underwriting results! You dang near have to be perfect. Has anyone else experienced this?

Which carriers should I look to for good underwriting? I heard ING Reliastar was not bad.
BatonRougeChicken is offline   Reply With Quote to Horrible Underwriting Carriers

Non-Medical Product

Register Now for FREE!
Are you an Insurance Agent Forum member yet? To sign up for your FREE INSTANT account, fill out the form below!

Username:     Password:   Confirm Password:     E-Mail:   Confirm E-Mail:

    Question of the day:   Please type "welcome" in this box Agree to forum rules 


Old 07-31-2010, 10:48 AM   #2
Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts:839
State: BNTRS is an Insurance Agent from Vermont
Re: Horrible Underwriting Carriers             Go to Top

Or maybe you just need healthier people. A lot of people need to come to grips with the fact that they are not as healthy as they want to think. Additionally, what kind of life insurance are we talking about?

ON does tend to favor younger healthier people in their underwriting.

ING has attractive underwriting guidelines.

Guardian has been a pretty aggressive underwriter in my experience, especially for the teetering on rated situations, they tend to be standard non smoker.

Massmutual has a very different approach from most, it's a point system, but some of the points are only attainable at certain ages (older).

I would say additionally look at what underwriting requirements the carrier has. ON for example tends to want more done at lower faces amounts than most (e.g. paramed when a lot will take a non-med and ekg way earlier age wise and at lower face amounts than others).

What kind of issues are you running into?
------------------------------------
If you want to be rich you must follow one simple rule...do what rich people do.
BNTRS is offline   Reply With Quote to Horrible Underwriting Carriers
Old 07-31-2010, 11:03 AM   #3
Super Genius
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts:21
State: BatonRougeChicken is an Insurance Agent from Alabama
Re: Horrible Underwriting Carriers             Go to Top

230 cholesterol, elevated liver enzymes, weight issues, etc.

In addition, ON requires APS on anything over $1 million even if the client is 28.

Any carriers lenient on the APS requirements? I prefer policies to get issued ASAP.
BatonRougeChicken is offline   Reply With Quote to Horrible Underwriting Carriers
Old 07-31-2010, 11:05 AM   #4
Guru
Larry Tew on Horrible Underwriting Carriers - Insurance Agent Forum
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts:316
State: Larry Tew is an Insurance Agent from North Carolina
Re: Horrible Underwriting Carriers             Go to Top

I've been using ON for several years. I have found them reasonable. I just finished a case with an avid rock climber. Several companies were applied to, and they ALL came back with a $5/k flat extra, except ON. They offered $2.50/k. BUT... one of the $5 companies offered waiver of premium, and ON would not budge on offering waiver. On larger cases, reinsurance offers will have more to do with the rate than the primary company.
------------------------------------
"Disclaimer: This post is intended for entertainment purposes only. Nothing in this post should be considered as financial advice. The poster is not responsible for the use or misuse of this post in part or whole"
Larry Tew is offline   Reply With Quote to Horrible Underwriting Carriers
Old 07-31-2010, 11:15 AM   #5
Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts:839
State: BNTRS is an Insurance Agent from Vermont
Re: Horrible Underwriting Carriers             Go to Top

230 cholesterol, elevated liver enzymes, weight issues, etc.
What was the underwriting decision?

ON's retention is 1 million so they are going to reinsurance of some fashion beyond that amount. They are a small company, but a quality company. A million bucks is kind of a big deal to them, much more so than say New York Life. They do have to be careful about who they decide to ensure at that amount.

Additionally ON has an APS order request you can fax to underwriting before they even get the case. That can significantly speed up the process.
BNTRS is offline   Reply With Quote to Horrible Underwriting Carriers
Old 07-31-2010, 12:42 PM   #6
Guru
WinoBlues on Horrible Underwriting Carriers - Insurance Agent Forum
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts:1,727
State: WinoBlues is an Insurance Agent from Undisclosed Location
Re: Horrible Underwriting Carriers             Go to Top

>>""230 cholesterol, elevated liver enzymes, weight issues, etc.

In addition, ON requires APS on anything over $1 million even if the client is 28.""

"230 cholesterol, elevated liver enzymes, weight issues, etc." and over $1 million. And you think APS is out of line? If you are looking for $250,000 and below, there are several SI policies out there, However, your client will pay the price.

Kinda depends on what your priorities are. Or who's.
------------------------------------
"The poster is not responsible"
WinoBlues is offline   Reply With Quote to Horrible Underwriting Carriers
Old 07-31-2010, 01:48 PM   #7
Super Genius
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts:46
State: lqdirect01 is an Insurance Agent from Florida
Re: Horrible Underwriting Carriers             Go to Top

ING Reliastar's underwriting is decent; I have had good luck with them with clients with heart conditions. I have had some pretty good experiences with Trans Family and American General as well.
lqdirect01 is offline   Reply With Quote to Horrible Underwriting Carriers
Old 08-01-2010, 12:15 AM   #8
Super Genius
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts:21
State: BatonRougeChicken is an Insurance Agent from Alabama
Re: Horrible Underwriting Carriers             Go to Top

Originally Posted by WinoBlues View Post
>>""230 cholesterol, elevated liver enzymes, weight issues, etc.

In addition, ON requires APS on anything over $1 million even if the client is 28.""

"230 cholesterol, elevated liver enzymes, weight issues, etc." and over $1 million. And you think APS is out of line? If you are looking for $250,000 and below, there are several SI policies out there, However, your client will pay the price.

Kinda depends on what your priorities are. Or who's.
No no, those health issues are individually separated for each client. I don't have a client with all of those above listed issues.

For a 28 year old, who is completely healthy, an APS is still ordered for anything over a $1 million face
BatonRougeChicken is offline   Reply With Quote to Horrible Underwriting Carriers
Old 08-01-2010, 12:58 AM   #9
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts:2,098
Re: Horrible Underwriting Carriers             Go to Top

I don't know of any companies that won't order an APS for $1 million+ face amounts...that's a lot of money for any company to risk on not paying $25-100 for an APS.
------------------------------------
Virginia Life Insurance
dgoldenz is offline   Reply With Quote to Horrible Underwriting Carriers
Old 08-18-2010, 08:29 AM   #10
Super Genius
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts:20
State: oskie is an Insurance Agent from Florida
Re: Horrible Underwriting Carriers             Go to Top

sorry guys, this post is meaningless.....someone PM'd me and i have to get my 20 in before i can reply
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Just in case you missed my last post.....please see above

Last edited by oskie : 08-18-2010 at 08:30 AM. Reason: Posts merged
oskie is offline   Reply With Quote to Horrible Underwriting Carriers
Old 08-18-2010, 10:05 AM   #11
Super Genius
mustfastpitch on Horrible Underwriting Carriers - Insurance Agent Forum
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts:59
State: mustfastpitch is an Insurance Agent from Ohio
Re: Horrible Underwriting Carriers             Go to Top

Originally Posted by oskie View Post
sorry guys, this post is meaningless.....someone PM'd me and i have to get my 20 in before i can reply
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Just in case you missed my last post.....please see above
You need 20 posts before you can reply to a PM? WTF?

Get to 10 and you change from "New Member" to "Super Genius". Highlight of my year!

mustfastpitch is offline   Reply With Quote to Horrible Underwriting Carriers
Reply to Horrible Underwriting Carriers

  Insurance Forum > Insurance Agent Forum > Insurance Agents and Brokers Forum > Life Insurance Forum



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads with Horrible Underwriting Carriers
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Important Notice Regarding Underwriting UNITED HEALTH STIBROKER@AUSTIN.RR.COM Individual Health Insurance Forum 14 05-18-2010 09:18 PM
Given Current Economic/Financial Mess, Which Carriers Are Likely Long-Term Markets? rmasmas P&C Insurance Forum 0 02-26-2009 09:31 AM
California Carriers Hamper HRAs moonlightandmargaritas Employee Benefits Forum 0 12-20-2007 10:08 AM
Post-issue underwriting somarco General Insurance Agent Discussions 10 04-03-2007 02:20 PM
Underwriting somarco General Insurance Agent Discussions 4 12-02-2006 12:14 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12 Secure
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.