Age Nearest Vs Actual Age

Why don't companies make everything SIMPLE for all concerned by going to actual age instead of the age nearest formula?


Because using nearest age, they get to rate many people up a year and make more money.
Insurance companies are in business to make money. Our job is to help them make money because it keeps our careers safe.
 
Why don't companies make everything SIMPLE for all concerned by going to actual age instead of the age nearest formula?

Not for nothing, but it's usually right on the app and if you use an electronic quoter it's all built in. I have a hard time getting ahold of an underwriter with certain carriers and that drives me up the wall more than just about anything else.
 
Nearest age is more "accurate". It is the age to which you are closest.

Just get birthdays when you quote and enter that and you'll never have a problem.
 
Not for nothing, but it's usually right on the app and if you use an electronic quoter it's all built in. I have a hard time getting ahold of an underwriter with certain carriers and that drives me up the wall more than just about anything else.

Try calling AIG or Genworth underwriters. They have an aneurysm. Then call and cry to your IMO.
 
Attached is the Carrier Age Last Birthday List. Hope this helps.
(Some age last birthday carriers also allow back dating to save age.)
 

Attachments

  • age_last_birthday.pdf
    571 KB · Views: 53
You're looking at this the wrong way!

Age last is a great money making opportunity for many cases when your competition has fallen asleep and blindly quoted age nearest.

I won a number of cases when I was a writing agent where it made sense to backdate and save age on cases where my competitors were just looking blindly at age nearest.

.....in many states you can backdate up to 6 months if it makes sense.....but last i knew ohio was only allowed 3 months?

Good luck$$
 
Back
Top