- 24,967
No. I personally have one on my newest policy.
I look at them as more than current or future coverage of current kids. I also look the huge benefit of automatic coverage at day 15 for children that would not otherwise get coverage.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No. I personally have one on my newest policy.
I look at them as more than current or future coverage of current kids. I also look the huge benefit of automatic coverage at day 15 for children that would not otherwise get coverage.
I'm having a hard time understanding why a product that gives the child permanent life insurance, and gives the parents peace of mind (not to mention all the additional benefits perm insurance provides) that has an irr of around 5% long term a bad thing?
Cause Bob doesn't sell whole life. Bob owns a term quote engine, so if it's not term, it's crap.
There is nothing wrong with doing it different ways as long as it fits the desires of the person buying. We all have our favorite choice, but our job is to offer choices.
Sometimes the choice is 1, if any. Sometimes it's a dozen. We should present the pros and cons of each choice and let the consumer decide.
Insurability is the ONLY real reason to buy coverage on a 2 year old.
Genworth Life, 20 year term, $500,000, $245 per year.
And you think that underwriting is going to approve half a million on most two year olds?
If the parents are walking around with a million each (preferably one is higher than that but it's a good place to start) and the household income is at least $150k-$200k yeah... it happens. I've had juvie policies for $750k, and then throw on additional annual prems and the underwriting amounts can border on $1M.
Yes, it happens but that on "most" 2 year olds.
Yes, it happens but that on "most" 2 year olds.