Originally Posted by captiveagent
Mutual of Omaha has General Manager positions open in Hawaii and Boston. They also have District Manager positions open in a bunch of places across the US.
Does anyone think Mutual of Omaha would be a good place to join as a GM or DM?
Compensation estimates?
Anyone with company experience?
I would think so... if management/salary is what you want.
I'm in their system as what they call a "career agent" as opposed to a broker... but there is not that much difference. You can have a broker contract and you will make more commish if you only do a few deals... but you get little or no support. Otherwise you can be a "career agent" and get the training, support, a cube-office (I never use it... prefer to work at home), phones, etc... and you will make more money IF you do a volume. (There is no free lunch here.)
The MoO "career" agent contract is the most benign I've ever seen... like six pages without the word "non-compete" in it. Of course they own the book on their products until vesting but I can sell other life, annuity,
LTC, etc. products through any
GA I want if the MoO product does not meet the client's needs... or when (in most cases) MoO won't UW or even has a product (like a $15K/
mo DI buy-out on a 65 year old... their max is $10/month).
It ALL depends on the local manager and how "good" he or she is and how much time they will give you in training etc. My district office has training sessions twice a week on both product and sales. Last night we had an "orphan account" phone-a-thon and pizza afterward. I only got one appointment but it was a fun evening and the class they gave earlier on phone techniques was a good... I learned a few tricks for NOT sounding like a typical telemarketer.
The only negative for MoO is that rate-wise some of their products are not very competitive. However, I find that many (even most) clients don't care that much as they want the "good feeling" of the MoO (Wild Kingdom!) name and they don't want the cheapest TV or car or computer... and they understand the "value" (i.e. financial stability... at least perceived) that a well-advertised, old line firm like MassMutual, NYL, Met, MoO brings to the table... it is called "sleeping well at night."
Sure, there are many, many, MANY fine companies out there... but they would be a bear to sell here in my area because no one has heard of them... and with banks and other institutions all reporting "problems" clients seem to want to stick to the "tried and true." In my area "Dearborn Life" or "Mutual of Illinois" is not going to happen! Even West Coast Life or Banner is a hard(er) sell. "If they are so good, how come I never heard of them!" is what I hear from time to time.
Face it. Life insurance is "sold" not "bought" (like medical coverage.) It is easier to sell something well-known than something that isn't. That does not make it "right" or "better" but that's the reality of the marketplace and I learned long ago to "not fight the tape." (That expression dates me because I remember ticker-tape machines!)
Hope this helps. I know some folks will "blast" me for above but that's my story and I'm sticking to it. I long ago stopped caring what people on this board think. They can run their biz and I'll run mine and we'll all live in peace and harmony ("I have a dream!") The know-it-alls on this board call me a "Jackass"! That's OK. I'm not being sued, I'm not on anyone's Vector list, and I "hee-haw" all the way to the bank.
As always, YMMV.
Jackass Al