IMO - I don't think net worth has any bearing on who needs
LTC. Sure some who do have a net worth want to protect their assets, but some don't want to rely on kids and don't have the assets to cover
ltc, in that case they should get a plan as long as their monthly income can afford. Also, some might want to have choices as to where they receive their care, whether they have any savings or not. I have clients with 10K in savings but bring home a pretty good income from SS and pensions that would not be enough to foot the monthly payment of a good assisted living, but would never want to go to a Medicaid facility. A
LTC plan allows this to happen.
Sure some can't afford to have an unlimited plan and most don't need it. The average stay for someone who needs
LTC is something like 30 months. Therefore, I try to fill that atleast with a three year plan. If they can afford a longer plan then great. I also try and design the plan to make up the difference for what they might be able to pay out themselves. I wrote a sigle female a while back who brought in around 3000/
mo. Home is paid for and so if she went into a facility, her income would go to cover part of the 5500/
mo it would cost for the high end homes. Therefore she only needed a 2500 monthly benefit as opposed to 5500 which greatly reduced her premium. We actually went up to 3500 to cover HHC so she could stay at home for as long as possible.
I guess what I'm getting at is, you need to design the plan to fit the situation, everyone doesn't need the cadilac. Make sure it will cover the cost of what homes in the area whether wholly by the plan or a combination of plan and income and make sure they can afford the plan. And add inflation, always. And the need for
LTC coverage goes way beyond just protecting assets. And if they truly can't afford, have their kids pay for it. They are going to be ones who have to deal with. No kid wants to put thier parents in a nursing home, but if they do atleast it can be a nice one.
Once again, just my opinion.