Originally Posted by racjac
[COLOR=red]PRI[/COLOR][COLOR=blue]MERICA [/COLOR][COLOR=black]does not have conversion provision.[/COLOR]
So, no ability to take reduced paid-up coverage for things like final expense. I guess they have to buy a separate policy from another agent for that. How do you factor that cost in?
Originally Posted by racjac
Show me a whole life policy that can provide the same coverage as a term policy at the same cost.
Ok.
ACL contract with NML low mix $10,000 base WL / $490,000 complife initial term segment (self-converting using dividends and additions). Could also use EOL or VCL product.
- Term 20-year annual premium $800 (with you guys, $1000)
- ACL annual Premium $1500
After 20 years:
Your Term = $0 value or converts to more expensive ART
Cost= $20,000 with you guys, $16,000 with WCL or better priced carrier.
Cost to client = -$20,000
ACL (@20 years with paid up additions) = $150,000 reduced paid up insurance (no more premiums due with paid up additions).
Cost = $30,000
CSV ACL contract = $50,000
Cost to client =
+20,000
With the ACL, now client is up $20,000 and has a paid up for life policy which will not only be there for life, but will continue to grow without any premium payments as the annual dividend buys
more paid up additions. Kind of cool how that works, huh?
Now, he could invest the $10,000 he saved by buying the term product and would likely have at a conservative rate maybe $40,000 (rule of 7) so his net would be:
+$40,000 investment portfolio gains
-$20,000 cost of your term
+$20,000 net gain over the 20 years
Basically the same gain as with the ACL contract, EXCEPT with the ACL contract he has a paid up for life policy with no more premiums due (even at the guaranteed rate) which will continue to increase in size and CSV if he wants to ever cash out.
With the term scenario he broke even, so he did not lose either way. EXCEPT, now he is 20 years older and may or may not be able to buy insurance to replace what he just lost, or he may get rated into the tables. And you'd have to factor his new premium into the overall since he has to buy a new policy. The ACL is paid-up, so that is a free keeper.
BTW, I used NML in this example because they have great policy mix products that are self-converting AND have never failed to pay a dividend on their whole life since 1867. Also, I do not work for them nor with them.
Originally Posted by racjac
Usually it cost about twice as much to buy a whole life policy.
For same DB 100% whole life, a lot more than twice depending on how the policy is structured. Blended product, depends on the mix.
Originally Posted by racjac
Does your family have whole life?
Yes, and term also. What's your point?
Originally Posted by racjac
Sorry folks I would rather have a pile of money than have a pile of life policys when I retire.
Dow went from 14000 down to now 8500. Homes in CA are short-selling at 30% of the current mortgage on foreclosure. Where is that pile of money going to come from. The BTITD idea can work if 2 things happen: 1) the market goes up 2)they actually invest the difference and in something that increases in value.