Register here for full access to our forums

Insurance Agent Forum
Join our Facebook Fan Page  Join our LinkedIn Group of Insurance Agents  Follow Insurance Agents Forum on Twitter
Currently Online: 187
Members: 15,245
Discussions: 17,889
Messages: 232,129

Go Back   Insurance Agent Forum > Insurance Agents and Brokers Forum > Health Insurance Reform Forum

Health Choice One

Scroll down for a discussion on Senate Finance Committee Votes "NO" on Public Option within the Health Insurance Reform Forum.

Senate Finance Comm voted NO this afternoon, by a margin of 16-8, against the inclusion of a public option.... Rueters Article...


Reply to Senate Finance Committee Votes "NO" on Public Option
Old 09-29-2009, 03:15 PM   #1
Guru
 
SportsNut on Senate Finance Committee Votes "NO" on Public Option - Insurance Agent Forum
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts:1,457
State: SportsNut is an Insurance Agent from Indiana
Senate Finance Committee Votes "NO" on Public Option             Go to Top

Senate Finance Comm voted NO this afternoon, by a margin of 16-8, against the inclusion of a public option....

Rueters Article
------------------------------------
"A successful man is one who can lay a firm foundation with the bricks others have thrown at him."
David Brinkley
SportsNut is offline   Reply With Quote to Senate Finance Committee Votes "NO" on Public Option

Register Now for FREE!
Are you an Insurance Agent Forum member yet? To sign up for your FREE INSTANT account, fill out the form below!

Username:     Password:   Confirm Password:     E-Mail:   Confirm E-Mail:

    Question of the day:   What color are tomatoes? Agree to forum rules 


Old 09-29-2009, 03:44 PM   #2
Guru
 
CHUMPS FROM OXFORD on Senate Finance Committee Votes "NO" on Public Option - Insurance Agent Forum
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts:6,178
State: CHUMPS FROM OXFORD is an Insurance Agent from Ohio
Re: Senate Finance Committee Votes "NO" on Public Option             Go to Top

A good first step but not out of the woods yet.



Bloodbath this Saturday? I sure hope not.
------------------------------------
Ohio Health Insurance Quotes
Affordable Pennsylvania Health Insurance
Service since 1980 and Miami University Hockey Booster
Sporting News Fantasy Football Champion
CHUMPS FROM OXFORD is offline   Reply With Quote to Senate Finance Committee Votes "NO" on Public Option
Old 09-29-2009, 04:34 PM   #3
Guru
 
SportsNut on Senate Finance Committee Votes "NO" on Public Option - Insurance Agent Forum
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts:1,457
State: SportsNut is an Insurance Agent from Indiana
Re: Senate Finance Committee Votes "NO" on Public Option             Go to Top

Originally Posted by CHUMPS FROM OXFORD View Post
A good first step but not out of the woods yet.



Bloodbath this Saturday? I sure hope not.
The odds makers now have it a 29.5 pt spread, the third highest spread of the day for all NCAA games. It would be a good chance for Kelly to pad those Heisman-esque stats for T. Pike, but I think he is too much of a gentleman to do so. I would take the pts if I had a gun to my head... but honestly I know nothing about the Redskins football team.

Maybe they could sneak Big Ben back in for the weekend... speaking of which, I was a pretty happy boy last Sun. We have to celebrate those rare moments when they come. I'm sure you were on the other side of that one...
SportsNut is offline   Reply With Quote to Senate Finance Committee Votes "NO" on Public Option
Old 09-29-2009, 04:52 PM   #4
Guru
 
CHUMPS FROM OXFORD on Senate Finance Committee Votes "NO" on Public Option - Insurance Agent Forum
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts:6,178
State: CHUMPS FROM OXFORD is an Insurance Agent from Ohio
Re: Senate Finance Committee Votes "NO" on Public Option             Go to Top

Last week Zach Dysert (RS Fresh) made his debut at QB. He threw for over 330 and rushed for more than 100. 6-4 1/2 and a strong arm. Reminds people of Ben since he was the top-rated QB in Ohio.

He might make things interesting. But we're still two years away from a 7-9 win season.
CHUMPS FROM OXFORD is offline   Reply With Quote to Senate Finance Committee Votes "NO" on Public Option
Old 09-29-2009, 05:27 PM   #5
Guru
 
SportsNut on Senate Finance Committee Votes "NO" on Public Option - Insurance Agent Forum
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts:1,457
State: SportsNut is an Insurance Agent from Indiana
Re: Senate Finance Committee Votes "NO" on Public Option             Go to Top

Possible interesting trivia here Chumps... Z. Dysert from a Div VI school, and T. Pike from a Div IV school, opposing starters for Div I college programs; both from very small high schools. I suppose it has happened before, but seems unusual to me.
SportsNut is offline   Reply With Quote to Senate Finance Committee Votes "NO" on Public Option
Old 09-29-2009, 06:53 PM   #6
Guru
 
CHUMPS FROM OXFORD on Senate Finance Committee Votes "NO" on Public Option - Insurance Agent Forum
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts:6,178
State: CHUMPS FROM OXFORD is an Insurance Agent from Ohio
Re: Senate Finance Committee Votes "NO" on Public Option             Go to Top

You might be right.
CHUMPS FROM OXFORD is offline   Reply With Quote to Senate Finance Committee Votes "NO" on Public Option
Old 09-30-2009, 09:46 AM   #7
ABC
Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts:980
Re: Senate Finance Committee Votes "NO" on Public Option             Go to Top

This is huge!
With this vote I think we stay in business.

We all know any Gov. option kills our industry.
ABC is offline   Reply With Quote to Senate Finance Committee Votes "NO" on Public Option
Old 09-30-2009, 09:56 AM   #8
Guru
 
CHUMPS FROM OXFORD on Senate Finance Committee Votes "NO" on Public Option - Insurance Agent Forum
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts:6,178
State: CHUMPS FROM OXFORD is an Insurance Agent from Ohio
Re: Senate Finance Committee Votes "NO" on Public Option             Go to Top

I am still worried about the "Exchange" which probably will go through. it forces all of the policies to be issued through this program...almost GI.

Commish, if still paid, will be reduced.
CHUMPS FROM OXFORD is offline   Reply With Quote to Senate Finance Committee Votes "NO" on Public Option
Old 09-30-2009, 09:59 AM   #9
Guru
 
healthagent on Senate Finance Committee Votes "NO" on Public Option - Insurance Agent Forum
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts:10,612
State: healthagent is an Insurance Agent from Maryland
Send a message via Yahoo to healthagent
Re: Senate Finance Committee Votes "NO" on Public Option             Go to Top

Comp is anyone's guess with GI. I cannot name any GI model now that pays out more than 5%.
------------------------------------
Health Insurance Agents: Training, Support, Discounts, E&O for $440 www.ihiaa.com
healthagent is offline   Reply With Quote to Senate Finance Committee Votes "NO" on Public Option
Old 09-30-2009, 10:02 AM   #10
Guru
 
CHUMPS FROM OXFORD on Senate Finance Committee Votes "NO" on Public Option - Insurance Agent Forum
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts:6,178
State: CHUMPS FROM OXFORD is an Insurance Agent from Ohio
Re: Senate Finance Committee Votes "NO" on Public Option             Go to Top

And oddly...if it is GI...rates will have to go up...maybe by 15% or more. Does the public really understand this?

Also..if anyone understands this, because I'm still not clear...Will policies be available OUTSIDE of the exchange?
CHUMPS FROM OXFORD is offline   Reply With Quote to Senate Finance Committee Votes "NO" on Public Option
Old 09-30-2009, 10:40 AM   #11
Guru
 
healthagent on Senate Finance Committee Votes "NO" on Public Option - Insurance Agent Forum
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts:10,612
State: healthagent is an Insurance Agent from Maryland
Send a message via Yahoo to healthagent
Re: Senate Finance Committee Votes "NO" on Public Option             Go to Top

What's being sold to the public is this huge influx if young healthy people will be in the market which will keep the rates low.

These are the healthy uninsured prospects we speak to every day when we quote incredible rates come back with "can I have around....4 months to think about it?"

Last edited by healthagent : 09-30-2009 at 10:51 AM.
healthagent is offline   Reply With Quote to Senate Finance Committee Votes "NO" on Public Option
Old 09-30-2009, 10:48 AM   #12
djs
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts:2,395
State: djs is an Insurance Agent from California
Re: Senate Finance Committee Votes "NO" on Public Option             Go to Top

Originally Posted by healthagent View Post
What's being sold to the public is this huge influx if young health people will be in the market which will keep the rates low.
There is more truth in what is not being said though....
Most of these individuals will qualify for the subsidy, meaning they don't help keep rates low (but it comes from another pocket...). The other thing they are not saying is if they don't qualify for a subsidy, they refuse to tell this group that they will have to actually PAY for insurance, to help offset the cost of a 55 year olds heart attack.

Dan
djs is offline   Reply With Quote to Senate Finance Committee Votes "NO" on Public Option
Old 09-30-2009, 10:54 AM   #13
Guru
 
healthagent on Senate Finance Committee Votes "NO" on Public Option - Insurance Agent Forum
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts:10,612
State: healthagent is an Insurance Agent from Maryland
Send a message via Yahoo to healthagent
Re: Senate Finance Committee Votes "NO" on Public Option             Go to Top

We can go back to the Mass. model to see that it's a short-term patch. Did Mass. succeed in getting a lot of people insured? Yes.

However, they have not addressed long term costs, rate increases, access to primary care, etc...and the whole program is currently in the red.

All Congress want to do is take the Mass. model and multiply it by 49.
healthagent is offline   Reply With Quote to Senate Finance Committee Votes "NO" on Public Option
Old 09-30-2009, 11:03 AM   #14
Guru
 
Norwayguy on Senate Finance Committee Votes "NO" on Public Option - Insurance Agent Forum
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts:636
State: Norwayguy is an Insurance Agent from Maine
Re: Senate Finance Committee Votes "NO" on Public Option             Go to Top

Originally Posted by healthagent View Post
We can go back to the Mass. model to see that it's a short-term patch. Did Mass. succeed in getting a lot of people insured? Yes.

However, they have not addressed long term costs, rate increases, access to primary care, etc...and the whole program is currently in the red.

All Congress want to do is take the Mass. model and multiply it by 49.
Your forgeting another thing learned from the Mass model waiting times to be seen by a doctor and routine procedures are now among the highest in the nation.
------------------------------------
Peter G Langelier
plangelier@langelierinsurance.com http://www.langelierinsurance.com
Norwayguy is offline   Reply With Quote to Senate Finance Committee Votes "NO" on Public Option
Old 09-30-2009, 11:21 AM   #15
Guru
 
healthagent on Senate Finance Committee Votes "NO" on Public Option - Insurance Agent Forum
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts:10,612
State: healthagent is an Insurance Agent from Maryland
Send a message via Yahoo to healthagent
Re: Senate Finance Committee Votes "NO" on Public Option             Go to Top

State health law hasn’t cut ER traffic - BostonHerald.com

Let me tell you who's gonna take it right up the a** with health care reform - the middle class. Those who are earning just more than 300% of FLP and currently don't have coverage because they live check to check.
healthagent is offline   Reply With Quote to Senate Finance Committee Votes "NO" on Public Option
Old 09-30-2009, 11:41 AM   #16
al3
Guru
 
al3 on Senate Finance Committee Votes "NO" on Public Option - Insurance Agent Forum
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts:3,902
Re: Senate Finance Committee Votes "NO" on Public Option             Go to Top

Originally Posted by healthagent View Post

Let me tell you who's gonna take it right up the a** with health care reform - the middle class. Those who are earning just more than 300% of FLP and currently don't have coverage because they live check to check.
You mean they are not taking it in the shorts now?

The greed of you people is totally unparalleled to anything or anyone I've ever seen in my life.

You folks are actually happy that you will be able to make a six-figure income in a system that screws people over. Talk about being self-centered. It's your entire generation.

I'm glad you all despise me so much. It's a badge of honor.

I think a public option that would compete with the private sector is/was the only way to bring about cost containment.

But you neo-cons have won the day and you and I both know that the "industry" will "rule" the regulators.

Greed, greed, greed, greed, greed. You people disgust me.
al3 is offline   Reply With Quote to Senate Finance Committee Votes "NO" on Public Option
Old 09-30-2009, 11:51 AM   #17
Expert
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts:203
Re: Senate Finance Committee Votes "NO" on Public Option             Go to Top

I thought this was relevant. I called the IRS today to see if I could negotiate a late FEE they charged me. My corporate taxes were sent in three months late simply out of laziness. They charged me a $445 late fee. If you think credit cards are bad, try the IRS.

Okay, no big deal. The part that got me was when I called and finally got through the maze of phone call run around, a recording came on and said "your wait time could exceed 15 minutes." WTF!!! That blew me away because it's the first time I've ever heard your wait time could exceed 15 minutes. That's like 10 times the normal wait. Granted, the entire U.S. population is their customer or at least a large portion of it is. The track record is just not there to have enough confidence in the government to run health care.

So much for efficiency. I was ready to pay them that crazy fee but instead I hung up.
Bitnis is offline   Reply With Quote to Senate Finance Committee Votes "NO" on Public Option
Old 09-30-2009, 11:56 AM   #18
Guru
 
CHUMPS FROM OXFORD on Senate Finance Committee Votes "NO" on Public Option - Insurance Agent Forum
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts:6,178
State: CHUMPS FROM OXFORD is an Insurance Agent from Ohio
Re: Senate Finance Committee Votes "NO" on Public Option             Go to Top

Al...I, and many of us don't despise you. Actually, you're quite entertaining.

"public option that would compete with the private sector is/was the only way to bring about cost containment."

Perhaps this is the issue. I disagree with that statement. But i don't despise you for making that statement.
CHUMPS FROM OXFORD is offline   Reply With Quote to Senate Finance Committee Votes "NO" on Public Option
Old 09-30-2009, 12:02 PM   #19
Guru
 
healthagent on Senate Finance Committee Votes "NO" on Public Option - Insurance Agent Forum
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts:10,612
State: healthagent is an Insurance Agent from Maryland
Send a message via Yahoo to healthagent
Re: Senate Finance Committee Votes "NO" on Public Option             Go to Top

Like Medicare has "contained costs?" the Medicare fund depletes in 2019 - then by law it comes out of general funds.

Is that the gov't model for running health care?
healthagent is offline   Reply With Quote to Senate Finance Committee Votes "NO" on Public Option
Old 09-30-2009, 03:31 PM   #20
Expert
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts:157
State: stuy119 is an Insurance Agent from Illinois
Re: Senate Finance Committee Votes "NO" on Public Option             Go to Top

Originally Posted by CHUMPS FROM OXFORD View Post
I am still worried about the "Exchange" which probably will go through. it forces all of the policies to be issued through this program...almost GI.

Commish, if still paid, will be reduced.
An amendment was tacked onto the plan to allow brokers to sell it. Not sure what the commish would be (of course, no plan out there has any numbers attached), but it would still allow for us to remain in business.
stuy119 is offline   Reply With Quote to Senate Finance Committee Votes "NO" on Public Option
Reply to Senate Finance Committee Votes "NO" on Public Option

  Insurance Forum > Insurance Agent Forum > Insurance Agents and Brokers Forum > Health Insurance Reform Forum



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads with Senate Finance Committee Votes "NO" on Public Option
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Health Bill Senate Vote sunmed Health Insurance Reform Forum 6 12-19-2009 12:28 PM
Public Option Mess Winter Health Insurance Reform Forum 0 09-15-2009 08:08 AM
Public Option Continues Winter Health Insurance Reform Forum 25 09-10-2009 01:48 PM
Public Option Feedback from a South African... Rivers1 Health Insurance Reform Forum 0 08-10-2009 11:29 PM
Public Health Care Option somarco Health Insurance Reform Forum 91 07-15-2009 11:15 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12 Secure
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0