Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Some fokes qualify for full Medi-cal. Others, because of income, qualify for "Share of cost". This is what they pay out of pocket each month before Medi-cal pays. I had a man in last week. His share of cost was going up to $400/month. By selling him an " insurance product", (dental plan $78/month), that let him retain full Medi-cal. We are legally "playing the game" to benefit the Medi-cal beneficiary.
Oh cool haven't heard of anyone doing that in FL yet. I typically just put them on a D-SNP.
Some fokes qualify for full Medi-cal. Others, because of income, qualify for "Share of cost". This is what they pay out of pocket each month before Medi-cal pays. I had a man in last week. His share of cost was going up to $400/month. By selling him an " insurance product", (dental plan $78/month), that let him retain full Medi-cal. We are legally "playing the game" to benefit the Medi-cal beneficiary.
I do not understand this strategy at all. How does writing him an 'insurance product' do away with the spend-down? Is that a California thing or am I just not aware of something?
Why in the heck would you put someone with a spend down on a D-SNP? Are you serious?
Ok, so when you write an 'insurance product within 25 miles of your office in northern Cali it somehow does away with the spend-down amount?
If it is, then the better question is why wouldn't I put them on a DSNP?
Yes, the "insurance product" tips the scale. Monthly "share of cost" vanishes ---------- No SNP's in my area
Yes, the "insurance product" tips the scale. Monthly "share of cost" vanishes
----------
No SNP's in my area