You answered your own question...
I know what I think (most of the time).
I want to know why WC disagrees
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You answered your own question...
Hi kg--I don't disagree, which I think is the point SAI was making. I may not have stated it clearly though.I know what I think (most of the time). I want to know why WC disagrees
In the last couple of weeks I have had three clients ask me whether they should apply to begin receiving Social Security benefits before the new year (earlier then they had intended) in order to avoid this Part B increase, all of them currently paying a higher amount due to IRMAA. My response has been that the reduction in benefits from taking Social Security earlier than their FRA (their own and survivor) may more than offset the increase in part B premium. Has anyone else gotten this question from clients? And, if so, what are you telling them?
I occasionally get the question about what happens if the Part B deductible goes up and whether Plan F is a better choice as a hedge against that. But Plan F will increase by at least the amount of the Part B increase it is paying for. Then there is the premium increase problem Plan F beneficiaries will encounter in the years after it becomes a closed book in 2020.
Conclusion: Plan G still a no brainer over F, now more than ever. I use a part of my fall seminars to address the "Plan F is best" myth and get people to leave it every seminar. This fall, with the closed book future of F, it's going to be a stronger message to get the hell out of it now if can qualify. I did have one agent tell me she uses Plan F's elimination as a selling point for it. Get it before the government takes away your right to it. Horrible advice in my view, but it has a real appeal with a certain segment.
Plan G is not a "no brainer" any more.. Hmmm.
Maybe Plan F is the better value in some markets.
Thanks. Good to know.Those subject to IRMAA will not be saved by the Hold Harmless provision, anyway, so they should continue to defer.