You've made some interesting statements. I assume you have something other than your opinion to back it up.
For example, why would a doctor not accept assignment today but not in the future. Since neither Medicare nor the supplement pays the doctor directly can you imagine the billing a collection nightmare if a doctor opts out of accepting assignment? (I assume you understand this but if not I can explain in greater detail).
Why do you think Medicare pays doctors/hospitals less than private insurance? Do you believe doctors are taking a loss on Medicare patients and if so are they too stupid to stop now but will in the future?
Please respond with less than 500 words.
Rick
I can only speak of a small sample size, but based on EOB's I've seen for my family and then researching what Medicare reimburses for the same services, Medicare reimbursed less than my private insurance. Again, that's a very small sample size. The one other experience I had is a client who worked in the business office at Emory Hospital stated the following:
"Private insurance reimburses more than Medicare and Medicare reimburses more than Medicaid." She went on to say Medicaid reimburses about 10% of charges and there is no way they could stay open with Medicaid reimbursements if that was all they received.
With that said, if we were to go to a Medicare for All system, doctors and hospitals wouldn't have much of a choice unless they only saw cash paying customers.
Ironically, I saw a video clip yesterday of Bernie Sanders in 1987 stating that a single payer system such as Medicaid for All (yes he said Medicaid and not Medicare) in the US would bankrupt the country. To be fair, he was talking with someone from Canada and was asking him to speak to how they do it without bankrupting Canada. But Bernie obviously recognized the impact a single payer system would have on this country. Guess he has forgotten about that.