Frank said - " Don't talk about the MLM concept, don't charge them for training just hire them as agent trainees. I would plan to interview at least 10 agents before you actually agree to work with one of them. This will give you a good feel as to who is out there looking to become an insurance agent. Unless you have already done this I think you will be surprised by who is looking for this kind of work and responding to your recruiting efforts. I know I was when I first started to do that. "
As we speak - I have 7 people taking their pre-licensing course. They responded to some ads I ran and loved the idea. They all signed at $99 enrollment fee + licensing expenses + $49 per month. 100% of them had NO problem with it and joined same day. I have another 40 leads I'm following up with this week. When these people can make $600 on just 3
MA deals - it's peanuts to them - not even an issue actually.
" Something else to consider, you are talking about them working part time. There are very few people who have achieved any degree of success working part time at anything. "
I respectfully disagree. There are thousands of people from all walks of life enjoying a substantial residual income working "part-time" in a MLM environment.
" It is going to take a strong commitment to do what you will be asking and typically part time people aren't willing to do that. "
I'm not going to require them to do anything. There aren't any quotas to meet, meetings to attend, etc. They can earn as little or as much as they wish. The tools will be provided for them, but it's ultimately up to them to make it happen. Everyone will have an upline to lean on.
" It sounds more like you plan to make your money from the people and not from their insurance sales. "
LOL - $49 a month isn't what makes me tick. Basically - the fees are utilized to fund over head and expenses in the beginning. Those making money with the system / program will realize it's just a cost of doing business like leads, phone bills, internet access, etc. Those not making any money will have a decision to make. Also - we will have ongoing lead generating projects, so if someone decides "sales" or "insurance" isn't for them - they can still make a few bucks by generating leads in the field, via the phone, via the web, etc.
" I assume that you are going to have all the business they write in the agencies name so when they leave you still retain the renewals. "
A person from the board suggested we do that. We aren't into suppression - we're into growth. We won't retain everyone - but, they were free when they came - they'll be free when they leave.
Since we will be utilizing a level compensation system - the upline still deserves to get paid - so, we will probably do that. However - the writing agent would still earn their respective share provided they still service the client - whether or not they still work for us or not. Over-rides are a different story. If an agent wants to earn "team over-rides" - then they must qualify monthly to do so. The first qualifier is they must maintain a certain AV each quarter. Now - if someone has left the group - the chances are they won't qualify and the over-rides will just rollup due to compression.
" I admire your enthusiasm for this concept but I think you have several hundred miles of rough road and hairpin turns ahead of you. "
Man! You're not kiddin' . . . We'll keep it real simple, do what's right and everything else should fall into place.
John said - " Just where are you finding all these new agents? Newbies get pummeled with mailers upon getting licensed. Most new agents are already sponsored by captive outfits when they get licensed. "
We are attracting the stay at home mom/dad, truck driving couples, college students, laid off workers - anyone wanting a change. Anyone in the biz already - we don't really want - no offense. Thus the reasoning for us to rep only a few products - keep it simple, shorten the learning curve and still offer the client quality products and personal service.
" I agree with Frank - it sounds to me like you're trying to create a "I win, I win" situation so when agents don't write crap you still get paid. Great... just what this industry needs more of. "
Exactly the opposite. We're creating an opportunity for someone to get into the business at minimal cost WHILE they learn the ropes. In addition - recruiters want to be compensated for finding the agents, training them and providing the TLC the new agent will require - they aren't going to do this for free. In addition to the fees - the first 5 deals a new agent writes are shared with the recruiter (upline). Then the agent goes to a 75% contract. The max on personal will always be 75% - the rest is networked and shared via the team. Should an agent want more than 75% - they are free to choose their path of least resistance. We aren't re-creating slavery - we are creating an opportunity. Everything is going to be in black and white.
Thomas said - " Didn't the guy that wrote the book "
All You Can Do is All You Can Do, But all You Can Do Is Enough" already do this MLM thing? Think his name was Art. "
Yes! He did it very well actually. He stay focused - very few products and provided many with an opportunity. I was one of them in 1984 - but, it wasn't for me at that time. Trust me - the upfront was more than the $99 we are thinking of charging. Coach Williams has said to this day he regrets selling the company.
I'm actually trying to get an audience with him to "pick his brain" if he is willing. He's less than 2 hours away - but, it is difficult contacting him.
The spin off from ALW is Primerica and while many think they are "over-priced" in the marketplace, they have had positive growth and revenues year after year.
Note: They reasoning for me asking questions, seeking advice from this forum and other forums, calling those with experience to see what works for them, etc - is so I can structure a sound company from the get go.
We want to have a solid foundation, focus on a few core products and attract new clients knowing we can compete while offering them excellent service, competitive rates and quality health solutions for their families.
We'll see . . .
Tom