Originally Posted by armydad
Obama's picks are fine. They are not the worst in history.
Yeh but you have to admit that if Richardson ends out in the big house that that would have made it difficult to oversee the Department of Commerce. I am not saying that would have made him the worst in history but it does sort of challenge Obama's bullcrap where he and his press secretary say that the real problem is that Obamas standards are so high.
El crocko.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Originally Posted by bobson
Maybe I'm cynical, but does anyone believe that any governor that gets to appoint a US Senator honestly tries to pick one simply for the good of his or her state? I'm not sure that is a grammatically correct sentence. Here I go again...
I believe that anytime a governor gets to appoint a US Senator he or she does it for personal gain without regard to his or her state.
You have just outlined the essence of Blago's defense. Good luck to him with that.
No one questions that politics is a business of scratching someone else's back so that they will scratch yours. However, when a governor gets caught on tape talking to his brother and the brother is updating about a lobbyist buying the governors support on a bill and the aforementioned governor says the funds "have to be in the account by the end of the year" then that is a little problem he is going to have to splain to the jury as he did to the Legislature which ousted him.
You cant take payments into your account or your campaigns account for your public duties. If he didnt do that, then fine, tell it to the judge. But lets not say that this is just politics as usual. Maybe for Illinois it is. Lots of states still try to lock you up for it. Maybe he is innocent. Go for it Blago. You da man. You aint da governor man anymore though.