Possibly, my personal opinion is different, but others disagree. From a retiree's perspective the pitch is attractive . . . even though the presentation is rarely (if ever) accurate and mostly misleading.
If MA is the "wave of the future" is it a good business model for the agent?
For years DC has pushed the single payer system for health insurance and it never got off the ground. Then a charming young fellow came on the scene, connected with the younger crowd, women and minorities, and swept the political landscape with a Gordon Gecko style catchphrase . . . "Change, is good".
People bought the pitch. Some thought everything would be free an no one would have to pay for anything.
Of course they were wrong . . .
Now we have ACA, a fascist creation where government tells private enterprise what they can and cannot do. This change did not lower premiums but did create a massive subsidy program making the monthly cost affordable (after rebate) to low income individuals . . . everyone else is screwed in that regard.
It also promised to bend the health care cost curve downward. Never happened. Health care is more expensive than ever.
Insurance carriers and agents cheered the change . . . then envisioned a world where everyone would be required to buy their product and all those on the supply side would get wealthy.
Didn't happen.
Most health insurance carriers bailed on the market . . . same for agents. Consumers, for the most part, must go to a government site to shop, price and purchase health insurance. Agent commissions are lower and mostly restricted to open enrollment and SEP. The overall number of agents and carriers in the under 65 health insurance market fell off a cliff shortly after ACA was implemented.
The few carriers that remained in the market don't need (or want) agents, plus the government handle most of the DTC advertising. Carriers are bootlicker's and lapdogs for the government.
MAPD is moving in the same direction. DTC advertising comes from CMS and the carriers. Frankly, I am surprised agents are still in the game. While some agents produce a fair amount of business (mostly because of artificial incentives) a number of agents create headaches for the carriers. It has always been that way in the health insurance side. Agents who know how to sell but have no idea what they are selling or how the product works, create problems, and losses, for carriers.
How long before the MAPD market is no longer a profitable business model for agents? Change, is good . . . or is it?
If MA is the "wave of the future" is it a good business model for the agent?
For years DC has pushed the single payer system for health insurance and it never got off the ground. Then a charming young fellow came on the scene, connected with the younger crowd, women and minorities, and swept the political landscape with a Gordon Gecko style catchphrase . . . "Change, is good".
People bought the pitch. Some thought everything would be free an no one would have to pay for anything.
Of course they were wrong . . .
Now we have ACA, a fascist creation where government tells private enterprise what they can and cannot do. This change did not lower premiums but did create a massive subsidy program making the monthly cost affordable (after rebate) to low income individuals . . . everyone else is screwed in that regard.
It also promised to bend the health care cost curve downward. Never happened. Health care is more expensive than ever.
Insurance carriers and agents cheered the change . . . then envisioned a world where everyone would be required to buy their product and all those on the supply side would get wealthy.
Didn't happen.
Most health insurance carriers bailed on the market . . . same for agents. Consumers, for the most part, must go to a government site to shop, price and purchase health insurance. Agent commissions are lower and mostly restricted to open enrollment and SEP. The overall number of agents and carriers in the under 65 health insurance market fell off a cliff shortly after ACA was implemented.
The few carriers that remained in the market don't need (or want) agents, plus the government handle most of the DTC advertising. Carriers are bootlicker's and lapdogs for the government.
MAPD is moving in the same direction. DTC advertising comes from CMS and the carriers. Frankly, I am surprised agents are still in the game. While some agents produce a fair amount of business (mostly because of artificial incentives) a number of agents create headaches for the carriers. It has always been that way in the health insurance side. Agents who know how to sell but have no idea what they are selling or how the product works, create problems, and losses, for carriers.
How long before the MAPD market is no longer a profitable business model for agents? Change, is good . . . or is it?