- Thread starter
- #21
term2u
Super Genius
- 101
I would also concur with scagnt83's assessment.
My *guess* would be that perhaps this was the only single premium life product that they had to sell, so that's why they sold it? AIG did just recently divest of their agent field force, so perhaps that was the reason for that recommendation?
Thanks for the input, guys! I was going to look into whether it would make sense to surrender this policy and put him into a SPGUL, guaranteed to age 121.
The problem is, is that he'll lose the roughly $3k in surrender charges.. Definitely a bummer, but the client is coming to me looking for a continuous pay GUL, so that's what makes it a tough call.