- 1,926
Perhaps DCT can answer your question.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For straight death benefit, a UL policy will most often have a significantly higher death benefit up front. However with a good participating whole life policy, in the later years of life, there will be significant death benefit growth through the use of paid up additions.
I frequently sell WL policies in excess of 250k and the reasons are for the guarantees associated with whole life and the flexibility of withdrawals/loans without affecting the cost of insurance. Not to make this a UL vs. WL debate but I find that the type of policy I sell depends on the clients needs. I have found that in most situations, if cash value is a primary goal of the life insurance, then to properly fund a UL, will be similar in premium to a WL/Term blend. My unofficial, very general, with some exceptions-ish rule is UL= Flexibility Now, WL= Flexibility at withdrawal.
Why are you blending, why not stack the two policies on top of each other? That tends to avoid the problem, and you can convert the term over time.
Thank you for posting. What is the client's age and occupation ? Did he currently have whole life policies?
I've only sold wl to peeps that had no life insurance and were looking for FE, and those that currently had wl and were stacking the polices from time to time in increments.
One is a web designer, age 32. He did not have WL prior to working with me.
Thank you. That's all I needed to know. Now, I am going to search for ~32 year old web designers, apparently they can afford it.
Btw, I meant to post this in the life forum, and put it here by accident.
Most agents don't have the balls to ask for that size premium.
Why are you blending, why not stack the two policies on top of each other? That tends to avoid the problem, and you can convert the term over time.