- 2,960
yes I agree that it is increditable that that happens.
You realize that the Y in yes should be capitalized and a comma after it, right?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
yes I agree that it is increditable that that happens.
I wrote a client with UHC during his open enrollment period. He had already been diagnosed with cancer and started his radiation and chemo treatments the same month his policy went into effect. UHC paid all of his claims with no waiting period.
You realize that the Y in yes should be capitalized and a comma after it, right?
That is acceptable so long as you do not use most incredible. No superlatives.What about incredible? Would that work?
That's good! Maybe it's state specific. My state's DOI shows UHC having a 3 month waiting period for pre-existing conditions, while most of the other companies have none. ---------- Yes, that's increditable.
That is acceptable so long as you do not use most incredible. No superlatives.
Reviving old thread, in part because of a situation where I am trying to get an answer from a carrier.
As I understand (based on this and other p-x threads) these carriers treat p-x as such.
Aetna - Waives p-x during OE and with prior creditable coverage. However, if applying without prior creditible coverage within days of effective date p-x applies .... even during OE.
UHC - Always has a 3 month wait for p-x, even with creditable coverage.
New Era - Waives p-x for applicants if applying during OE regardless of prior coverage.
If any of you have information that contradicts what I posted above, feel free to annotate.
That leaves a bunch of carriers that either do not apply p-x or have a p-x that can be waived in certain situations.
How do the following treat p-x?
MOO (and their downstream carriers), Blue Cross (yes, I realize this may be a state by state thing but asking any way), CSI/CSI Life, Medico, Equitable, Bankers Fidelity ......