- 281
Hello, this might be a dumb question but with alot of advice saying that Mutual companies are better in alot of ways.
What would be some of the reason as a client would one buy say a Metlife over a Mass Mutual whole life.
or any of the other smaller insurance companies like Monumental etc.
In terms of strength, being mutual, does that effect the product that the customer gets in the end as far as more cash value or anything like that.
Are there ever times when it is a better deal for a client to buy say a smaller company whole life rather than mutual?
If so would that be in cases only like if they don't qualify?
Do you think that the underwriting for companies that are not mutual are less strict?
I guess my main question is as an independent broker what are some situations you would offer a whole life that is not from a mutual company? Since it seems that more agents seem to think the mutual companies are better to go with? or is that just for training and not necessarily products? Thanks.
What would be some of the reason as a client would one buy say a Metlife over a Mass Mutual whole life.
or any of the other smaller insurance companies like Monumental etc.
In terms of strength, being mutual, does that effect the product that the customer gets in the end as far as more cash value or anything like that.
Are there ever times when it is a better deal for a client to buy say a smaller company whole life rather than mutual?
If so would that be in cases only like if they don't qualify?
Do you think that the underwriting for companies that are not mutual are less strict?
I guess my main question is as an independent broker what are some situations you would offer a whole life that is not from a mutual company? Since it seems that more agents seem to think the mutual companies are better to go with? or is that just for training and not necessarily products? Thanks.