I didn't answer the question because I don't know. Nor do I care. I don't use the Shenandoah story as a scare tactic. But, if I were going to I would have all the facts. I wouldn't tell stories about someone's uncle that knew somebody that heard that an FE agent was taken to court over a rescinded claim.
You are the one that said, , "I bet anything that the Shenandoah people would have jumped at the chance to get 60% now vs 100% years down the road.".. I was just wondering what you were basing that statement on.. Was it "years down the road" ? So it wasn't years down the road that the Shenandoah folks got their money as you implied? You just made that up to fit your agenda?
Last edited: