- Thread starter
- #11
- 100
I read all the contracts. They say exclusive leads and the legal term for exclusive is
Not divided or shared with others: exclusive publishing rights
My lawyer said they may be able to argue that they didn't specifically grant "exclusive rights" but he said if a jury got ahold of this, it would be lights out for them.
He did say that they were committing fraud by advertising them as "exclusive" and there is no defense to that.
Not divided or shared with others: exclusive publishing rights
My lawyer said they may be able to argue that they didn't specifically grant "exclusive rights" but he said if a jury got ahold of this, it would be lights out for them.
He did say that they were committing fraud by advertising them as "exclusive" and there is no defense to that.
You do realize that most of these companies have bullet proof contracts, right? If you're that serious about it you should start a thread rallying other agents. My guess, any credible attorney is going to review what you signed and realize you don't have a case. Unless you can prove they are doing this intentionally you're probably better off letting it go. Do you have any evidence of this? If not, I'm sure there are plenty of attorney's willing to take your money. My guess is the reason the other agents backed out was because they needed to throw some chips in the game and they didn't have any, but I could be wrong about that.