- 15,041
Assuming they are with Great American, an agent would be an *** to contract with them anyway. Isn't there already another thread about Great American marketing this to Cigna PDP clients and trying to steal them away from the agent?
New CIGNA Medicare Supplement
- Thread starter The Brokerage Resource
- Start date
-
- Tags
- medicare
Assuming they are with Great American, an agent would be an *** to contract with them anyway. Isn't there already another thread about Great American marketing this to Cigna PDP clients and trying to steal them away from the agent?
BeantownExpress
Expert
- 26
The 22% is for years 1-6 and then the 3% kicks in for years 7-10.
- 558
Any word on if Cigna has been approved in NV yet? I got my hands on the proposed rates and they are really competitive here.
Does your contract have the non-replacement language?
Section 14: Policy Replacement Prohibited
Associate agrees that during the term of this Agreement, and for a period of two (2) years following its termination for any reason, Associate shall not directly or indirectly contact, solicit, communicate or meet with any of Company’s policyholders, including those policyholder’s which Associate or its Subagents wrote with the Company, for the purpose of rewriting, canceling, lapsing or replacing Company policies, and Associate shall not rewrite, cancel, lapse or replace any Company policy. Company’s policyholders specifically includes, those policyholders introduced to Company through Associate and its Subagents. In addition, Associate shall not permit Subagents under its control to engage in a pattern or practice of replacing, lapsing, canceling, or rewriting Company’s policyholders. Without the agreement contained in this Section 14, Company would not enter into this Agreement and would not provide Associate with the printed materials identified in Section 12 of this Agreement and access to the electronic web-portal.
Furthermore, Associate shall not directly or indirectly attempt to or persuade an agent or producer of Company to terminate or reduce his or her relationship with Company.
Section 14: Policy Replacement Prohibited
Associate agrees that during the term of this Agreement, and for a period of two (2) years following its termination for any reason, Associate shall not directly or indirectly contact, solicit, communicate or meet with any of Company’s policyholders, including those policyholder’s which Associate or its Subagents wrote with the Company, for the purpose of rewriting, canceling, lapsing or replacing Company policies, and Associate shall not rewrite, cancel, lapse or replace any Company policy. Company’s policyholders specifically includes, those policyholders introduced to Company through Associate and its Subagents. In addition, Associate shall not permit Subagents under its control to engage in a pattern or practice of replacing, lapsing, canceling, or rewriting Company’s policyholders. Without the agreement contained in this Section 14, Company would not enter into this Agreement and would not provide Associate with the printed materials identified in Section 12 of this Agreement and access to the electronic web-portal.
Furthermore, Associate shall not directly or indirectly attempt to or persuade an agent or producer of Company to terminate or reduce his or her relationship with Company.
- 11,280
Did you know that new era/PA has a clause like that in their contract?
- 11,280
What's a non piracy clause? The one I'm reasoning says you will be terminated for directly or indirectly inducing a policyholder to cancel...
- 1,255
This thread is about 6 months old.
Does anyone have any new opinions / experiences about CIGNA's American Retirement Life / Loyal branded MedSupp?
Does anyone have any new opinions / experiences about CIGNA's American Retirement Life / Loyal branded MedSupp?
I was calling someone that was ready to set appointment to sign up and she told me she had already purchased a plan F here in Indiana. Premiums for T65 are 107? WOW, I guess they dont want their policy holders on the books that long. While all the other companies that have been in the market for years fight for competitiveness, CIGNA comes in and tries to lure the seniors in with their introductory rates...shame! Reminds me of a few other companies that went down this road in the last few years also
