- 10,340
Midland is by far one of the most upstanding, ethical, and easiest to deal with carriers I have ever dealt with.
The most recent lawsuit in CA was nothing more than a grey area in the CA insurance code. Basically the policies sold (association policies) violated the 10/10 rule in CA... but the policy Situs was in another state that did not have the 10/10 regs. CA claimed they could not do that.
The biggest online complaint about Midland is from an agent, and not from consumers. I wonder if that agent is MNLU??? lol. jk (unless you are the guy who runs the midland national review site...)
Here is a response from an agent about this guy:
Most consumer complaints I have found are clients upset at agents.
Midland has no more lawsuits than Anico, NYL, MM, NWM, LFG, Allianz, AG, ING, Guardian, Met, Pru, etc, etc.
If an agent refused to do business with any company that has been involved in a lawsuit they would do no business at all.
With the SSA issue, Midland was hardly the only company to have that issue. Prudential and Met were both slapped on the wrist for that as well.
Obviously this MNLU guy has some type of vendetta against Midland. Maybe he was caught up in the CA debacle here recently... idk. But to post that they are some type of exception is just complete and total BS.
The most recent lawsuit in CA was nothing more than a grey area in the CA insurance code. Basically the policies sold (association policies) violated the 10/10 rule in CA... but the policy Situs was in another state that did not have the 10/10 regs. CA claimed they could not do that.
The biggest online complaint about Midland is from an agent, and not from consumers. I wonder if that agent is MNLU??? lol. jk (unless you are the guy who runs the midland national review site...)
Here is a response from an agent about this guy:
The original report was authored by Eric , who has brought numerous lawsuits against Midland National Life. In 1991 he was a disgrunteled agent who decided to take an employee hostage at the Midland National home office and went to prison for the crime. He owns and operates the web site midland-national-review.com and has posted the same false accusations on every other web site including this one. The man is a kook and a convicted criminal. He has never proved any of the accusations about Midland National. His latest April of 2010 lawasuit is nothing more than an attempt to extort money from Midland National.
Most consumer complaints I have found are clients upset at agents.
Midland has no more lawsuits than Anico, NYL, MM, NWM, LFG, Allianz, AG, ING, Guardian, Met, Pru, etc, etc.
If an agent refused to do business with any company that has been involved in a lawsuit they would do no business at all.
With the SSA issue, Midland was hardly the only company to have that issue. Prudential and Met were both slapped on the wrist for that as well.
Obviously this MNLU guy has some type of vendetta against Midland. Maybe he was caught up in the CA debacle here recently... idk. But to post that they are some type of exception is just complete and total BS.