SCOTUS Decision Poll

How will SCOTUS decide?

  • FFM APTC Allowed - All stays the same

    Votes: 17 47.2%
  • NO FFM APTC - effective immediately

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • NO FFM APTC -delayed for 6-18 months

    Votes: 10 27.8%
  • Make Congress rewrite text of the law

    Votes: 4 11.1%
  • Something else out of left field

    Votes: 5 13.9%

  • Total voters
    36
  • Poll closed .
And I would expect an agent who feels secure selling and purchasing a Co-Op policy to be in favor of an unsustainable law since you are ok with having insurance from an unsustainable insurer that your E&O does not even cover...

Just called my E&O, thank you for pointing that out... I'm good. But I do feel better about calling them and being 100% certain you are once again... incorrect.
 
That wasn't part of the survey.

well who cares about people who dont pay taxes, in my book if you don't pay taxes or haven't paid a min amount in your life time, you shouldnt get a "vote", the people paying the bills should be the ones voting
 
And here's the argument they can use to get around the 4 words...

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/chevron_deference

Unless they are unreasonable.

Plus Chevron was brought up in the brief and the government and justices agreed Chevron wasn't applicable in this instance.

----------

JUSTICE KENNEDY: Well, if it's ** if it's
ambiguous, then we think about Chevron. But it seems to
me a drastic step for us to say that the Department of
Internal Revenue and its director can make this call one
way or the other when there are, what, billions of
dollars of subsidies involved here? Hundreds of millions?
 
Just called my E&O, thank you for pointing that out... I'm good. But I do feel better about calling them and being 100% certain you are once again... incorrect.

Your E&O covers non rated carriers? Who do you use?
Did you ask if they cover Co-Ops or did you ask about non-rated carriers? Co-Ops are covered. But every E&O policy I have ever seen does not cover carriers under a B rating... so why don't you share who this carrier is that is one of the most unique policies on the market.
 
Unless they are unreasonable.

Plus Chevron was brought up in the brief and the government and justices agreed Chevron wasn't applicable in this instance.

----------

JUSTICE KENNEDY: Well, if it's ** if it's
ambiguous, then we think about Chevron. But it seems to
me a drastic step for us to say that the Department of
Internal Revenue and its director can make this call one
way or the other when there are, what, billions of
dollars of subsidies involved here? Hundreds of millions?

Kennedy said that. Not Roberts. And Roberts is a Federalist at heart.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top